From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@yandex.ru>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: forcing write-back from FS - again
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 02:55:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071022025516.848198f3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <471C6FA8.30500@yandex.ru>
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:38:48 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@yandex.ru> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/writeback.h b/include/linux/writeback.h
> >> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ static inline int task_is_pdflush(struct task_struct *task)
> >> */
> >> enum writeback_sync_modes {
> >> WB_SYNC_NONE, /* Don't wait on anything */
> >> + WB_SYNC_NONE_PG,/* Don't wait on anything, don't touch locked pages */
> >> WB_SYNC_ALL, /* Wait on every mapping */
> >> WB_SYNC_HOLD, /* Hold the inode on sb_dirty for sys_sync() */
> >> };
> >
> > It would be simpler/safer/saner to add a new bitflag to writeback_control
> > and use that directly. The WB_SYNC_foo flags are a holdover from an
> > earlier time and really should be made to go away, in favour of directly
> > setting up an appropriate writeback_control.
>
> You mean something like (wbc->flags & WB_SYNC_NONE) etc? But below you used
> wbc->skip_locked_pages, I'm confused.
take a look at struct writeback_control:
unsigned nonblocking:1; /* Don't get stuck on request queues */
unsigned encountered_congestion:1; /* An output: a queue is full */
unsigned for_kupdate:1; /* A kupdate writeback */
unsigned for_reclaim:1; /* Invoked from the page allocator */
unsigned for_writepages:1; /* This is a writepages() call */
unsigned range_cyclic:1; /* range_start is cyclic */
unsigned more_io:1; /* more io to be dispatched */
Add another one...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-22 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-21 20:19 forcing write-back from FS - again Artem Bityutskiy
2007-10-21 20:55 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-22 8:52 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-10-22 9:05 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-22 9:38 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-10-22 9:55 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-10-22 10:04 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071022025516.848198f3.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dedekind@yandex.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox