public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Tal Kelrich <tal@musicgenome.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4/2.6 local TCP connect oddity
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 05:21:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071022032145.GA14735@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071021225329.1a971751@shodan.orpak.com>

On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 10:53:29PM +0200, Tal Kelrich wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:29:02 +0200
> Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 05:53:37PM +0200, Tal Kelrich wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I've run into a problem where a process trying to connect to a local
> > > port within the local port range eventually ends up connected to
> > > itself, with source port = dest port.
> > > 
> > > similar behavior can be gotten by running netcat as follows:
> > > nc -p 1025 localhost 1025
> > > 
> > > I'm not really sure if that's a bug, but the original case was at
> > > least unexpected.
> > 
> > It is not a bug, it is caused by the "simultaneous connect" feature of
> > TCP. Although rarely used, in TCP you can connect two clients
> > together. They just have to exchange their SYN, SYN/ACK then ACK and
> > bingo, they're connected. In fact, you found the easiest way to
> > achieve it, by using the same port. To demonstrate the feature, I'm
> > used to either temporarily block SYNs with iptables, or by unplugging
> > the cable between two machines.
> > 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It still seems confusing that a connect against localhost may
> randomly succeed.
> 
> Here's a better example, if somewhat violent. eventually succeeds.
> (p=$((`cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range|cut -f1`+1)); while
> true ; do nc -v -v 127.0.0.1 $p ; done)

Of course, for the same reason. If you reduce the ip_local_port_range, it
will even succeed more often. This is because the source port is choosen
before the first packet is sent, so when it is sent, it reaches a pending
connection (itself).

I can understand that it is confusing when you see it as a single
connection, but try to imagine (or reproduce) with 2 machines, then
translate that to the localhost with a single and same connection.
You may even draw the exchanges on paper, an you will notice that
"each end" of the connection gets its SYN-SYN/ACK-ACK sequence.

You may also tcpdump on loopback if that helps.

Regards,
Willy


      reply	other threads:[~2007-10-22  3:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-21 15:53 2.4/2.6 local TCP connect oddity Tal Kelrich
2007-10-21 17:29 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-10-21 20:53   ` Tal Kelrich
2007-10-22  3:21     ` Willy Tarreau [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071022032145.GA14735@1wt.eu \
    --to=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tal@musicgenome.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox