From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753394AbXJVOdz (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:33:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752337AbXJVOdr (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:33:47 -0400 Received: from hpsmtp-eml16.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.38.116]:2844 "EHLO hpsmtp-eml16.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752221AbXJVOdq (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:33:46 -0400 From: Frans Pop To: Alexey Starikovskiy Subject: Re: latest 2.6.23 git missing ACPI POWER_SUPPLY Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:33:41 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: Jeff Chua , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <471CA0AA.4000904@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <471CA0AA.4000904@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710221633.42619.elendil@planet.nl> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2007 14:33:42.0937 (UTC) FILETIME=[8BA3E090:01C814B8] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 22 October 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > Frans Pop wrote: > > I must say that having these relatively top-level ACPI settings > > depending on something that is relatively buried away is not very > > intuitive! Especially not since at first glance you don't really seem > > to need that option except for some weird hardware. > > > > CC'ing ACPI mailing list for other opinions. > > I was thinking that 'select' might be more appropriate here... > Please take a look on attached patch. Perfect! The power supply option can now no longer be unselected while battery or ac options are selected and will automatically get correct modular or compiled in status. Thanks. Tested-by: Frans Pop