From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Crispin Cowan <crispin@crispincowan.com>,
Thomas Fricaccia <thomas_fricacci@yahoo.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
LSM ML <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: LSM conversion to static interface
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:56:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071022165621.GC29876@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071022175043.0aa65957@the-village.bc.nu>
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 05:50:43PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> For that reason I think keeping LSM is the right thing to do.
Wait, we aren't talking about dropping LSM at all, just the "LSM is a
module" option. That's it. And by making LSM not a module, we can then
go on to fix some of the reported speed issues that are present with the
LSM option enabled right now.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-22 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-22 2:24 LSM conversion to static interface Thomas Fricaccia
2007-10-22 3:59 ` Greg KH
2007-10-22 17:47 ` Avi Kivity
2007-10-23 16:05 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-23 16:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-10-22 10:07 ` Alan Cox
2007-10-22 16:10 ` Crispin Cowan
2007-10-22 16:50 ` Alan Cox
2007-10-22 16:56 ` Greg KH [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-25 11:33 Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-26 10:40 ` Samir Bellabes
2007-10-22 17:00 Thomas Fricaccia
2007-10-22 17:12 ` Alan Cox
2007-10-22 17:13 ` Greg KH
2007-10-23 5:14 ` Crispin Cowan
2007-10-23 5:32 ` david
2007-10-23 11:38 ` Simon Arlott
2007-10-23 5:53 ` Giacomo Catenazzi
2007-10-23 7:12 ` Crispin Cowan
2007-10-23 8:17 ` Giacomo A. Catenazzi
2007-10-24 3:41 ` Greg KH
[not found] <167451.96128.qm@web38607.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
2007-10-18 2:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-19 20:26 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2007-10-19 20:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-20 11:05 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-20 22:57 ` James Morris
2007-10-21 22:59 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-23 9:13 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-23 5:44 ` Giacomo Catenazzi
2007-10-23 8:55 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-23 9:14 ` Giacomo A. Catenazzi
2007-10-23 9:18 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-23 15:20 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-10-23 15:28 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-23 15:34 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-10-25 10:23 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-10-19 21:07 ` James Morris
2007-10-18 1:34 Thomas Fricaccia
2007-10-18 2:03 ` Casey Schaufler
2007-10-18 2:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-18 3:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071022165621.GC29876@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=crispin@crispincowan.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas_fricacci@yahoo.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox