From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Anas Nashif <nashif@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marek Dabek <marek.dabek@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Intel Manageability Engine Interface driver
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:25:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071023092551.3c822df6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <471DF79B.20801@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:31:07 -0400 Anas Nashif <nashif@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:22:38 -0400 Anas Nashif <nashif@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> The patch is large so I'm placing the diff on the web for download
> >> rather than attaching it here. Download:
> >>
> >> http://download.openamt.org/intel-MEI.diff
> >
> > Please get the patches mailed out somehow. Consider splitting the patch
> > up. I think you could send it as-is (200k will fit, I believe) but it's
> > rather too large to review effectively.
> >
> > The code looks good from a quick scan. Immediate impressions from a
> > quick scan, mainly trivia:
> >
>
> We will fix the issues below and send the revised patch to the list.
>
> >
> >
> > - Why does a new driver have "additional char device for legacy mode"?
> >
>
> It is not quite new. What is currently considered legacy was supported
> on Linux with a driver that was never submitted upstream (although it is
> open-source and available from e1000.sf.net).
> Some applications still use the legacy interface (KCS style) and have to
> be supported with the new driver as well.
>
It would be better to remove the lecacy mode support from the new driver
and to continue to ship a patch for those people who use the old interface.
They've been patching in the whole driver thus far so I assume all the
processes are already in place for this.
>
> > - The changelog could do with some expansion. What is "Intel(R)
> > Manageability Engine (ME) firmware"? Why do we want to include this code
> > in Linux? What value has it to our users, etc? Bascially: tell us more
> > stuff.
>
> The core hardware architecture of Intel Active Management Technology
> (Intel AMT) is resident in firmware. The micro-controller within the
> chipset's graphics and memory controller (MCH) hub houses the Management
> Engine (ME) firmware, which implements various services on behalf of
> management applications. Additionally, flash memory houses system BIOS,
> code used by the management engine, and a third-party data store (3PDS)
> that enables applications to store information as needed in non-volatile
> memory.
>
> Communication between the host OS and the ME is accomplished by means of
> the Intel Management Engine Interface (aka HECI: Host Embedded
> Controller Interface ). MEI is bi-directional, and either the host or
> Intel AMT firmware can initiate transactions.
>
> Some of the ME subsystems that can be access via MEI driver:
>
> - Intel(R) Quiet System Technology (QST) is implemented as a firmware
> subsystem that runs in the ME. Programs that wish to expose the
> health monitoring and fan speed control capabilities of Intel(R) QST
> will need to use the MEI driver to communicate with the ME sub-system.
> - ASF is the "Alert Standard Format" which is an DMTF manageability
> standard. It is implemented in the PC's hardware and firmware, and is
> managed from a remote console.
>
> Most recent Intel desktop chipsets have one or more of the above ME
> services. The MEI driver will make it possible to support the above
> features on Linux and provides applications access to the ME and it's
> features. The MEI drivers will also help bridge a current gap related to
> lm_sensors support on recent desktop chipsets.
>
I see, thanks. That would be a fine addition to the patch's changelog,
please.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-23 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-22 17:22 [PATCH] Intel Manageability Engine Interface driver Anas Nashif
2007-10-22 18:28 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-10-22 18:40 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-23 13:31 ` Anas Nashif
2007-10-23 13:36 ` Maxim Levitsky
2007-10-23 16:25 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-10-23 15:04 ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-10-23 16:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-10-23 18:05 ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-10-23 18:22 ` Roland Dreier
2007-10-23 19:35 ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-10-24 9:00 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2007-10-23 16:32 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-22 22:30 ` Maxim Levitsky
2007-10-23 13:35 ` Anas Nashif
2007-10-23 13:42 ` Maxim Levitsky
2007-10-25 9:33 ` Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071023092551.3c822df6.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek.dabek@intel.com \
--cc=nashif@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox