Re: LSM conversion to static interface

Greg KH
2007-10-22T16:56:42Z

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 05:50:43PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> For that reason I think keeping LSM is the right thing to do.

Wait, we aren't talking about dropping LSM at all, just the "LSM is a
module" option. That's it. And by making LSM not a module, we can then
go on to fix some of the reported speed issues that are present with the
LSM option enabled right now.

thanks,

greg k-h