From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Paul Menage" <menage@google.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] CFS CGroup: Report usage
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:08:37 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071023173837.GG4667@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6599ad830710230941y5d175688ob3a4d9ac42ba8c8f@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 09:41:49AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> > > Adds a cpu.usage file to the CFS cgroup that reports CPU usage in
> > > milliseconds for that cgroup's tasks
> >
> > It would be nice to split this into user and sys time at some point.
>
> Sounds reasonable - but does CFS track this?
No, not for a group. We could extend account_user_time() and
account_systime_time() in this regard.
> > We have also received request to provide idle time for a
> > container/cgroup.
>
> The semantics of "idle time" for a cgroup on a shared system seem a
> bit fuzzy. How would you define it?
I think the percentage of time when it didn't have any runnable task in
its runqueues.
> Suppose you have two cgroups that would each want to use, say, 55% of
> a CPU - technically they should each be regarded as having 45% idle
> time, but if they run on a the same CPU the chances are that they will
> both always have some processes on their runqueue due to contention
> with the other group. So how would you measure the difference between
> this and a cgroup that really is trying to use 100%?
Good point. I think we need to subtract out the time it was waiting on runqueue
when calculating idle time.
|------- . . . . . . ---------zzzzzzzzzzzz.......-----------|
t0 t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 t6
---- -> Running time
.... -> Waiting time (to get on the cpu)
zzzz -> Sleeping time (when it didnt want to run because of
lack of tasks)
So, in this case,
idle time = (t4 - t3) / [ (t6 - t1) - (t2-t1) - (t5-t4)
?
This idle time will be a per-cpu stat for every cgroup and needs to be
consolidated across cpus into a single idle-stat number, just like how
top does it.
--
Regards,
vatsa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-23 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-23 0:49 [PATCH 2/2] CFS CGroup: Report usage Paul Menage
2007-10-23 2:40 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-10-23 6:06 ` Paul Menage
2007-10-23 7:21 ` Paul Menage
2007-10-23 7:49 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-23 7:53 ` Paul Menage
2007-10-23 7:57 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-23 8:08 ` Paul Menage
2007-10-23 16:41 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-10-23 3:17 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-23 6:09 ` Paul Menage
2007-10-23 16:43 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-10-23 16:47 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-10-23 16:41 ` Paul Menage
2007-10-23 17:38 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2007-10-24 2:28 ` Paul Menage
2007-10-24 4:39 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-10-26 1:24 ` Paul Menage
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071023173837.GG4667@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox