public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* libata PATA status for VIA 8237
@ 2007-10-24  9:56 DervishD
  2007-10-24 12:48 ` Thierry Vignaud
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: DervishD @ 2007-10-24  9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux-kernel

    Hi all :)

I'm thinking about switching fully to libata in the near future
(currently I'm using CONFIG_IDE for all my PATA drives, both hard disks
and DVD recorder), and I was wondering if PATA support for VIA8237 was
full or not. For what I've googled, it seems that it is usable both for
PATA and for SATA, but I want to be sure.

If I'm asking here is because I have SATA support for my VIA chipset
enabled in the kernel (CONFIG_SATA_VIA), but I'm getting these messages:

    sata_via 0000:00:0c.0: version 2.0
    sata_via 0000:00:0c.0: routed to hard irq line 10
    ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFE00 ctl 0xFE0A bmdma 0xFA00 irq 10
    ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFD00 ctl 0xFD0A bmdma 0xFA08 irq 10
    scsi0 : sata_via
    ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 310)
>>  ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xFE07
    scsi1 : sata_via
    ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 310)
>>  ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xFD07
    sata_via 0000:00:0f.0: routed to hard irq line 11
    ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xF900 ctl 0xF802 bmdma 0xF500 irq 11
    ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xF700 ctl 0xF602 bmdma 0xF508 irq 11
    scsi2 : sata_via
    ata3: SATA link down 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>>  ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xF907
    scsi3 : sata_via
    ata4: SATA link down 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>>  ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xF707

Since I don't have any SATA disk on my system, I haven't given any
importance to these messages, but now that I want to switch to libata,
I'm concerned. I don't understand the marked messages, and I don't know
if they have to do with CONFIG_IDE and CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX being
enabled together with CONFIG_SATA_VIA.

My kernel is 2.6.20.18 and my mobo has three PATA busses and four SATA
ports (which I think they are ata1-ata4 in the messages above. I don't
know why only two of them are marked as 1.5Gbps, according to the mobo
manual, all four are 1.5Gbps).

Thanks a lot in advance and feel free to ask if you need more
information about hardware or software.

    Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado

-- 
Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net
It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to... RAmen!
We are waiting for 13 Feb 2009 23:31:30 +0000 ...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: libata PATA status for VIA 8237
  2007-10-24  9:56 libata PATA status for VIA 8237 DervishD
@ 2007-10-24 12:48 ` Thierry Vignaud
  2007-10-24 14:33   ` DervishD
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thierry Vignaud @ 2007-10-24 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux-kernel

DervishD <lkml@dervishd.net> writes:

> I'm thinking about switching fully to libata in the near future
> (currently I'm using CONFIG_IDE for all my PATA drives, both hard disks
> and DVD recorder), and I was wondering if PATA support for VIA8237 was
> full or not. For what I've googled, it seems that it is usable both for
> PATA and for SATA, but I want to be sure.
> 
> If I'm asking here is because I have SATA support for my VIA chipset
> enabled in the kernel (CONFIG_SATA_VIA), but I'm getting these messages:
> 
>     sata_via 0000:00:0c.0: version 2.0
>     sata_via 0000:00:0c.0: routed to hard irq line 10
>     ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFE00 ctl 0xFE0A bmdma 0xFA00 irq 10
>     ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFD00 ctl 0xFD0A bmdma 0xFA08 irq 10
>     scsi0 : sata_via
>     ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 310)
> >>  ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xFE07
>     scsi1 : sata_via
>     ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 310)
> >>  ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xFD07
>     sata_via 0000:00:0f.0: routed to hard irq line 11
>     ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xF900 ctl 0xF802 bmdma 0xF500 irq 11
>     ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xF700 ctl 0xF602 bmdma 0xF508 irq 11
>     scsi2 : sata_via
>     ata3: SATA link down 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> >>  ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xF907
>     scsi3 : sata_via
>     ata4: SATA link down 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> >>  ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xF707

I saw those too from times to times on boot with a VIA VT6421 with no
consequences.
So I would say they're non important (but who know for real until you
test with real disk attached?)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: libata PATA status for VIA 8237
  2007-10-24 12:48 ` Thierry Vignaud
@ 2007-10-24 14:33   ` DervishD
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: DervishD @ 2007-10-24 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Vignaud; +Cc: Linux-kernel

    Hi Thierry :)

 * Thierry Vignaud <tvignaud@mandriva.com> dixit:
> DervishD <lkml@dervishd.net> writes:
> > I'm thinking about switching fully to libata in the near future
> > (currently I'm using CONFIG_IDE for all my PATA drives, both hard disks
> > and DVD recorder), and I was wondering if PATA support for VIA8237 was
> > full or not. For what I've googled, it seems that it is usable both for
> > PATA and for SATA, but I want to be sure.
> > 
> > If I'm asking here is because I have SATA support for my VIA chipset
> > enabled in the kernel (CONFIG_SATA_VIA), but I'm getting these messages:
> > 
> >     sata_via 0000:00:0c.0: version 2.0
> >     sata_via 0000:00:0c.0: routed to hard irq line 10
> >     ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFE00 ctl 0xFE0A bmdma 0xFA00 irq 10
> >     ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFD00 ctl 0xFD0A bmdma 0xFA08 irq 10
> >     scsi0 : sata_via
> >     ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 310)
> > >>  ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xFE07
> >     scsi1 : sata_via
> >     ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 310)
> > >>  ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xFD07
> >     sata_via 0000:00:0f.0: routed to hard irq line 11
> >     ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xF900 ctl 0xF802 bmdma 0xF500 irq 11
> >     ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xF700 ctl 0xF602 bmdma 0xF508 irq 11
> >     scsi2 : sata_via
> >     ata3: SATA link down 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> > >>  ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xF907
> >     scsi3 : sata_via
> >     ata4: SATA link down 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> > >>  ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xF707
> 
> I saw those too from times to times on boot with a VIA VT6421 with no
> consequences.
> So I would say they're non important (but who know for real until you
> test with real disk attached?)

I think I can manage to get a SATA disk to make tests, but the problem
is that I won't be able to make destructive (destroying the data, I
mean, not the hardware XD) tests on it :((

Merci :)

    Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado

-- 
Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net
It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to... RAmen!
We are waiting for 13 Feb 2009 23:31:30 +0000 ...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-24 14:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-24  9:56 libata PATA status for VIA 8237 DervishD
2007-10-24 12:48 ` Thierry Vignaud
2007-10-24 14:33   ` DervishD

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox