public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: yokota@netlab.is.tsukuba.ac.jp, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] nsp32_restart_autoscsi(): remove error check
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:54:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071024165434.GZ30533@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1193244072.3396.17.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:41:12PM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 18:25 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The Coverity checker noted that we'll anyway Oops later when we ran into 
> > this condition - and the error check didn't prevent that.
> > 
> > Considering that the error condition shouldn't be possible, and we are 
> > not able to handle it easily, this patch simply removes the pointless 
> > error check.
> 
> This is the one where I said I don't like the fact that you're removing
> the explanatory message that's printed before we crash.  if you want to
> shut coverity up and stop sending the patch, I'm happy adding a BUG();
> after the nsp32_msg().

Sorry, I missed your answer when resending since it was in a different 
thread.

I'm still not convinced we really need the nsp32_msg() here but you are 
the maintainer and it's not a big deal anyway

A BUG() would IMHO be similarly pointless as the nsp32_msg() at this 
point and there's no value in changing code only for the sake of the 
Coverity checker.

> James

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-24 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-24 16:25 [RFC: 2.6 patch] nsp32_restart_autoscsi(): remove error check Adrian Bunk
2007-10-24 16:41 ` James Bottomley
2007-10-24 16:54   ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-23 19:33 Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071024165434.GZ30533@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yokota@netlab.is.tsukuba.ac.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox