From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: trenn@suse.de
Cc: linux-acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Detect hwmon and i2c bus drivers interfering with ACPI Operation Region resources
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:57:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071024205723.458fab97.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1193236319.4590.225.camel@queen.suse.de>
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:31:59 +0200 Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> wrote:
> it seems Len's test tree and Linus tree diverged a bit, at least with
> this patch set things do not apply cleanly.
>
> Therefore I post these for discussion whether and in which kernel tree
> they should end up before doing work for nothing.
> If they are still a candidate for 2.6.24 (rather unintrusive), pls tell
> me whether and when I should base them against Len's test/release branch
> or whatever other tree.
> If not, it would be great if they can be included into the -mm tree and
> I can rebase them against this one.
I staged the three acpi patches against Len's tree and I staged the hwmon
patch against Mark's tree and I staged the I2C patch against Jean's tree.
This means that if/when the ACPI patches have gone me->Len->Linus, I can
send the I2C patch to Jean and the hwmon patch to Mark and we're all good.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-25 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-24 14:31 [PATCH 0/5] Detect hwmon and i2c bus drivers interfering with ACPI Operation Region resources Thomas Renninger
2007-10-25 3:57 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-10-25 13:51 ` Jean Delvare
2007-10-25 20:24 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-26 19:23 ` Jean Delvare
2007-10-25 12:04 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2007-10-25 15:54 ` Jean Delvare
2007-10-25 15:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-10-25 22:55 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-10-26 3:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-10-26 10:45 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-10-26 13:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-10-26 20:39 ` Jean Delvare
2007-10-27 15:09 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-10-29 2:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-10-29 13:11 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-10-30 18:43 ` Jean Delvare
2007-10-25 21:36 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071024205723.458fab97.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox