From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
jens.axboe@oracle.com, rjw@sisk.pl,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
htejun@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-2.6.23-git3: Many sysfs-related warnings in dmesg
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:52:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071024235231.GA6160@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071024234348.GA4909@kroah.com>
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:43:48PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:16:54PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 16:23 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 03:32:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > > From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
> > > > Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:37:30 -0700
> > > >
> > > > > Kay, are we doing something wrong in userspace when renaming wireless
> > > > > devices such that we can overlap names?
> >
> > Not udev, but SUSE 10.2's network renaming. It uses udev and calls
> > ifrename in the same code path. 10.3 uses the unified version from the
> > udev tree.
> >
> > > > It does it for all network devices, I see this ugly message on every
> > > > single system I have from Fedora foo to RHEL foo to ubuntu foo to
> > > > debian foo.
> > > >
> > > > udev simply applies the MAC address to device name rules blindly, it
> > > > doesn't check if the device already has the desired name already
> >
> > There is a check for the same name in udev for long.
> >
> > > Ugh :(
> > >
> > > > It's been like this forever, and since userland has been doing it for
> > > > so long, you can't warn on this there is too much established
> > > > practice. Expecting people to install "fixed" udev is not an
> > > > acceptable answer, the warning is a regression and therefore you'll
> > > > have to remove the kernel warning for this case and live with this
> > > > issue essentially forever.
> >
> > We should probably just add the check to kobject_rename() and print a
> > simple warning and then do nothing. Or just do the check in the network
> > ioctl, if we really don't want to see this.
>
> I agree that perhaps kobject_rename() should check for this. Let me go
> see if I can get that to work...
Can someone try this patch, and see what happens when they try to rename
an object to something that is already existing?
thanks,
greg k-h
---
lib/kobject.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
--- a/lib/kobject.c
+++ b/lib/kobject.c
@@ -366,6 +366,19 @@ int kobject_rename(struct kobject * kobj
if (!kobj->parent)
return -EINVAL;
+ /* see if this name is already in use */
+ if (kobj->kset) {
+ struct kobject *temp_kobj;
+ temp_kobj = kset_find_obj(kobj->kset, new_name);
+ if (temp_kobj) {
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "kobject '%s' can not be renamed "
+ "to '%s' as '%s' is already in existance.\n",
+ kobject_name(kobj), new_name, new_name);
+ kobject_put(temp_kobj);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
+
devpath = kobject_get_path(kobj, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!devpath) {
error = -ENOMEM;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-24 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-13 19:26 linux-2.6.23-git3: Many sysfs-related warnings in dmesg Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-16 4:50 ` Greg KH
2007-10-16 20:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-16 20:42 ` Greg KH
2007-10-16 20:50 ` Jens Axboe
2007-10-16 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-16 21:36 ` Greg KH
2007-10-16 23:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-17 10:17 ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-17 17:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-16 21:37 ` Greg KH
2007-10-16 22:32 ` David Miller
2007-10-16 23:23 ` Greg KH
2007-10-17 10:16 ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-24 23:43 ` Greg KH
2007-10-24 23:52 ` Greg KH [this message]
2007-10-25 16:58 ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-17 10:22 ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-17 10:33 ` Jens Axboe
2007-10-17 10:44 ` Jens Axboe
2007-10-16 20:49 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-26 17:05 Larry Finger
2007-10-26 18:07 ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-26 18:20 ` Larry Finger
2007-10-27 2:36 ` Greg KH
2007-10-27 6:08 ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-27 6:32 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071024235231.GA6160@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox