public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	jens.axboe@oracle.com, rjw@sisk.pl,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	htejun@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-2.6.23-git3: Many sysfs-related warnings in dmesg
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:52:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071024235231.GA6160@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071024234348.GA4909@kroah.com>

On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:43:48PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:16:54PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 16:23 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 03:32:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > > From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
> > > > Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:37:30 -0700
> > > > 
> > > > > Kay, are we doing something wrong in userspace when renaming wireless
> > > > > devices such that we can overlap names?
> > 
> > Not udev, but SUSE 10.2's network renaming. It uses udev and calls
> > ifrename in the same code path. 10.3 uses the unified version from the
> > udev tree.
> > 
> > > > It does it for all network devices, I see this ugly message on every
> > > > single system I have from Fedora foo to RHEL foo to ubuntu foo to
> > > > debian foo.
> > > >
> > > > udev simply applies the MAC address to device name rules blindly, it
> > > > doesn't check if the device already has the desired name already
> > 
> > There is a check for the same name in udev for long.
> > 
> > > Ugh :(
> > > 
> > > > It's been like this forever, and since userland has been doing it for
> > > > so long, you can't warn on this there is too much established
> > > > practice.  Expecting people to install "fixed" udev is not an
> > > > acceptable answer, the warning is a regression and therefore you'll
> > > > have to remove the kernel warning for this case and live with this
> > > > issue essentially forever.
> > 
> > We should probably just add the check to kobject_rename() and print a
> > simple warning and then do nothing. Or just do the check in the network
> > ioctl, if we really don't want to see this.
> 
> I agree that perhaps kobject_rename() should check for this.  Let me go
> see if I can get that to work...

Can someone try this patch, and see what happens when they try to rename
an object to something that is already existing?

thanks,

greg k-h


---
 lib/kobject.c |   13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

--- a/lib/kobject.c
+++ b/lib/kobject.c
@@ -366,6 +366,19 @@ int kobject_rename(struct kobject * kobj
 	if (!kobj->parent)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* see if this name is already in use */
+	if (kobj->kset) {
+		struct kobject *temp_kobj;
+		temp_kobj = kset_find_obj(kobj->kset, new_name);
+		if (temp_kobj) {
+			printk(KERN_WARNING "kobject '%s' can not be renamed "
+			       "to '%s' as '%s' is already in existance.\n",
+			       kobject_name(kobj), new_name, new_name);
+			kobject_put(temp_kobj);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+
 	devpath = kobject_get_path(kobj, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!devpath) {
 		error = -ENOMEM;

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-24 23:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-13 19:26 linux-2.6.23-git3: Many sysfs-related warnings in dmesg Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-16  4:50 ` Greg KH
2007-10-16 20:04   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-16 20:42     ` Greg KH
2007-10-16 20:50       ` Jens Axboe
2007-10-16 21:13         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-16 21:36           ` Greg KH
2007-10-16 23:58             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-17 10:17               ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-17 17:35                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-16 21:37         ` Greg KH
2007-10-16 22:32           ` David Miller
2007-10-16 23:23             ` Greg KH
2007-10-17 10:16               ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-24 23:43                 ` Greg KH
2007-10-24 23:52                   ` Greg KH [this message]
2007-10-25 16:58                     ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-17 10:22         ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-17 10:33           ` Jens Axboe
2007-10-17 10:44             ` Jens Axboe
2007-10-16 20:49     ` Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-26 17:05 Larry Finger
2007-10-26 18:07 ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-26 18:20   ` Larry Finger
2007-10-27  2:36   ` Greg KH
2007-10-27  6:08     ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-27  6:32       ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071024235231.GA6160@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox