Re: [2.6 patch] unexport tick_nohz_get_sleep_length

[Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>]

Applied.

thanks,
-Len

On Thursday 25 October 2007 12:56, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> > >On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >
> > >> This patch removes the unused 
> > >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tick_nohz_get_sleep_length).
> > >> 
> > >> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
> > >> 
> > >> ---
> > >> f7c83dfe117f4fd072b2506ae090e4145abda362 
> > >> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > >> index 10a1347..5997456 100644
> > >> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > >> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > >> @@ -320,8 +320,6 @@ ktime_t tick_nohz_get_sleep_length(void)
> > >>  	return ts->sleep_length;
> > >>  }
> > >>  
> > >> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tick_nohz_get_sleep_length);
> > >> -
> > >
> > >Hmm, this was added to allow the cpuidle governers modular
> > >build. Seems this was changed to compiled in only.
> > >
> > >Len, Venki, is this the final decision ?
> > >
> > 
> > Yes. This was done recently for proper fallback to old ACPI policy in
> > case CPUIDLE is not selected. With that being module, falling back to
> > ACPI policy at run time makes things ugly.
> 
> Makes sense. I go ahead and nuke the export.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>