public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: "Paul Menage" <menage@google.com>
Cc: bunk@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] kernel/cgroup.c: remove dead code
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:37:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071025183721.705c13d0.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6599ad830710251826g5669a4cw3696ad500ff90bb4@mail.gmail.com>

pj wrote:
> Check out the assembly code generated by:
>
>     BUG_ON(sizeof(cgrp->root->release_agent_path) < PATH_MAX));
>
> (Hint: you can't find it ;)
>
> It -is- compile time!

To be clear, BUG_ON() in general is a runtime check.

But the compiler can optimize out constant expressions,
and code conditionally executed in the case of a constant
that can never be true.

Adrian wrote:
> > It -is- compile time!
> 
> But when the condition is fulfilled, you get a runtime error, not a 
> compile error.

Correct you are.  And when I advocated BUG_ON in this role, I did
two things:
 1) I was blissfully ignorant of BUILD_BUG_ON(), which would be
    better here, for the reasons you state, and
 2) I did a silent calculation in my head, noticing that if the
    constants ever changed so as to trigger this check, it would
    show up really quickly in testing, because it was on code path
    that would be hard to miss.  Because of this, the delay until
    runtime of this check was less of a disaster than it would
    have been on a rarely traveled code path.

In sum - Adrian is right - use BUILD_BUG_ON() here.

Thanks, Adrian.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-26  1:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-24 16:25 [2.6 patch] kernel/cgroup.c: remove dead code Adrian Bunk
2007-10-24 16:30 ` Paul Menage
2007-10-24 17:07   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-24 17:13     ` Paul Menage
2007-10-24 17:34   ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-26  1:10     ` Paul Menage
2007-10-26  1:19       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-26  1:24       ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-26  1:26         ` Paul Menage
2007-10-26  1:37           ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2007-10-26  1:30         ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071025183721.705c13d0.pj@sgi.com \
    --to=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox