From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>
Cc: linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: IRQ off latency of printk is very high
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:19:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071025201948.GO17536@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4720F21F.9090404@am.sony.com>
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 12:44:31PM -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
> I've been looking at 'IRQ off' latency in the Linux kernel, on
> version 2.6.22 for target using an ARM processor.
> I use a serial console, at 115200 bps.
Printk to the serial console uses polled I/O to get deterministic,
reliable, and -timely- output. If our very next statement (or interrupt)
may lock up the box, we want to be sure our printk has actually been
delivered before that happens.
Kindof a bummer for realtime, but also rather hard to get around.
> I've noticed that calls to printk disable interrupts for
> excessively long times. I have a long test printk of
> over 200 chars, that holds interrupts off for 24 milliseconds.
2000bits @ 115200bps -> 17.4ms
> Are these are really needed, with all this other locking
> going on? Any ideas for fixing this?
Well, we could have a commandline option that made messages with a
priority below X go out buffered. But it'd be a lousy default from a
debugging perspective.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-25 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-25 19:44 IRQ off latency of printk is very high Tim Bird
2007-10-25 20:19 ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2007-10-25 21:15 ` Tim Bird
2007-10-25 22:28 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-10-25 22:52 ` Tim Bird
2007-10-25 23:12 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-25 23:41 ` Tim Bird
2007-10-26 1:23 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-26 12:57 ` Benny Amorsen
2007-10-26 20:28 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-29 18:54 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-01 15:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-11-01 21:11 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-01 22:19 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071025201948.GO17536@waste.org \
--to=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox