From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757803AbXJZEe0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:34:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751425AbXJZEeT (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:34:19 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:43720 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750875AbXJZEeS (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:34:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:34:15 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: David Rientjes Cc: clameter@sgi.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ak@suse.de, Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option Message-Id: <20071025213415.e08d85d5.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20071025185506.8c373aa8.pj@sgi.com> <20071025192945.82962eea.pj@sgi.com> <20071025201455.acb4e72c.pj@sgi.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David wrote: > I think that documenting the change in the man page as saying that > "the nodemask will include all allowed nodes if the mems_allowed > of a memory_spread_user cpuset is expanded" is better. Ok. I'm inclined the other way, but not certain enough of my position to push the point any further. Good enough. > I've got a few fixes for my patchset queued so I'll resend it later Ok. Good work - thanks. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401