From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC] full suspend/resume support for i915 DRM driver
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:59:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071026045950.GA22920@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710251653.19978.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 04:53:18PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Ok, here's yet another version that uses the device model for the
> suspend/resume, rather than pci hooks.
>
> Greg, DRM desperately needs review of its device model usage, can you
> take a look at this patch and the current drm_sysfs.c code? Right now,
> we're mixing class_devices and regular devices (the latter seem to be
> required for suspend/resume to work correctly), but this seems wrong.
> Any ideas? Should we just rip out the class_device stuff and create
> full-on DRM device nodes?
The class_device stuff is already ripped out in the latest -mm trees and
I will be forwarding that change on for 2.6.25 after 2.6.24 is out. So
yes, it should be taken away :)
But converting from class_device to struct device does not mean you use
a "device node". But you could if you want to :)
Other than that, the driver model usage isn't the best, but I think the
majority of the major issues are fixed up now, especially with the
removal of class_device. Is there anything specific you are curious
about?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-26 5:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-18 21:01 [RFC] full suspend/resume support for i915 DRM driver Jesse Barnes
2007-10-20 2:51 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-10-23 4:15 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-10-24 20:17 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-24 21:07 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-10-24 13:35 ` Pavel Machek
2007-10-24 15:18 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-10-24 21:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-25 23:53 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-10-26 4:59 ` Greg KH [this message]
2007-10-26 16:57 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-10-26 17:10 ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-26 18:12 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-10-26 18:21 ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-26 18:40 ` fixing up DRM device model usage Jesse Barnes
2007-10-26 19:08 ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-26 21:31 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-10-27 21:12 ` Kay Sievers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071026045950.GA22920@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox