public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@knobisoft.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc1: First impressions
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:22:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071026152221.GA26619@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <796505.25770.qm@web32612.mail.mud.yahoo.com>


* Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@knobisoft.de> wrote:

> Hi ,
> 
>  just to give some feedback on 2.6.24-rc1. For some time I am tracking 
>  IO/writeback problems that hurt system responsiveness big-time. I 
>  tested Peters stuff together with Fenguangs additions and it looked 
>  promising. Therefore I was very happy to see Peters stuff going into 
>  2.6.24 and waited eagerly for rc1. In short, I am impressed. This 
>  really looks good. IO throughput is great and I could not reproduce 
>  the responsiveness problems so far.
> 
>  Below are a some numbers of my brute-force I/O tests that I can use 
>  to bring responsiveness down. My platform is a HP/DL380g4, dual CPUs, 
>  HT-enabled, 8 GB Memory, SmartaArray6i controller with 4x72GB SCSI 
>  disks as RAID5 (battery protected writeback cahe enabled) and gigabit 
>  networking (tg3). User space is 64-bit RHEL4.3
> 
>  I am basically doing copies using "dd" with 1MB blocksize. Local 
>  Filesystem ist ext2 (noatime). IO-Scheduler is dealine, as it tends 
>  to give best results. NFS3 Server is a Sun/T2000/Solaris10. The tests 
>  are:
> 
> dd1 - copy 16 GB from /dev/zero to local FS
> dd1-dir - same, but using O_DIRECT for output
> dd2/dd2-dir - copy 2x7.6 GB in parallel from /dev/zero to local FS
> dd3/dd3-dir - copy 3x5.2 GB in parallel from /dev/zero lo local FS
> net1 - copy 5.2 GB from NFS3 share to local FS
> mix3 - copy 3x5.2 GB from /dev/zero to local disk and two NFS3 shares
> 
>  I did the numbers for 2.6.19.2, 2.6.22.6 and 2.6.24-rc1. All units 
>  are MB/sec.
> 
> test           2.6.19.2     2.6.22.6    2.6.24.-rc1
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> dd1                  28           50             96
> dd1-dir              88           88             86
> dd2              2x16.5         2x11         2x44.5
> dd2-dir            2x44         2x44           2x43
> dd3               3x9.8        3x8.7           3x30
> dd3-dir          3x29.5       3x29.5         3x28.5
> net1              30-33        50-55          37-52
> mix3              17/32        25/50          96/35 (disk/combined-network)

wow, really nice results! Peter does know how to make stuff fast :) Now 
lets pick up some of Peter's other, previously discarded patches as well
:-)

Such as the rewritten reclaim (clockpro) patches:

  http://programming.kicks-ass.net/kernel-patches/page-replace/

The improve-swap-performance (swap-token) patches:

  http://programming.kicks-ass.net/kernel-patches/swap_token/

His enable-swap-over-NFS [and other complex IO transports] patches:

  http://programming.kicks-ass.net/kernel-patches/vm_deadlock/

And the concurrent pagecache patches:

  http://programming.kicks-ass.net/kernel-patches/concurrent-pagecache/

as a starter :-) I think the MM should get out of deep-feature-freeze 
mode - there's tons of room to improve :-/

	Ingo "runs and hides" Molnar

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-26 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-26 14:18 2.6.24-rc1: First impressions Martin Knoblauch
2007-10-26 15:22 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-10-26 15:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-26 15:49     ` Rik van Riel
2007-10-26 19:21   ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-26 19:33     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-26 19:42       ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-27 19:14         ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-27  5:46     ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-10-27  5:59       ` Andrew Morton
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-29  8:29 Martin Knoblauch
2007-10-29 11:09 Martin Knoblauch
2007-10-29 11:40 ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071026152221.GA26619@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=spamtrap@knobisoft.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox