From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: trenn@suse.de, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Detect hwmon and i2c bus drivers interfering with ACPI Operation Region resources
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:23:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071026212306.40b4a12d@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071025132410.7ae184a8.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:24:10 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:51:35 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Thanks for picking these patches, having them in -mm for some time is
> > exactly what we need. Let's see how many systems are affected by the
> > resource conflicts and how we can fix them
>
> No probs. The main thing is to ensure that we have sufficient debug
> support in that patch so that if a tester does report a problem, we (ie:
> you ;) can resolve it on the first pass. So feel free to make it really
> noisy - we can always drop the debug stuff later on.
Well, I'm not exactly sure what we can do when people report conflicts,
except telling them "don't do that". I guess each case will be
different. We will have to ask reporters for their DSDT table, look at
it and... do something. I'll need (much) help from the ACPI developers.
At this point we are mainly trying to gather enough data to fully
understand how big the problem is. Solutions will come later.
> Also, please try to avoid adding anythig which would disrupt that tester
> from going on and testing all the other new code. ie: try to fail
> gracefully and fall back to the old behaviour.
User will simply miss their SMBus controller or their hardware
monitoring device, it wont prevent them from using their systems, but
that should be enough to get them to report (I hope).
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-26 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-24 14:31 [PATCH 0/5] Detect hwmon and i2c bus drivers interfering with ACPI Operation Region resources Thomas Renninger
2007-10-25 3:57 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-25 13:51 ` Jean Delvare
2007-10-25 20:24 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-26 19:23 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2007-10-25 12:04 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2007-10-25 15:54 ` Jean Delvare
2007-10-25 15:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-10-25 22:55 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-10-26 3:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-10-26 10:45 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-10-26 13:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-10-26 20:39 ` Jean Delvare
2007-10-27 15:09 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-10-29 2:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-10-29 13:11 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-10-30 18:43 ` Jean Delvare
2007-10-25 21:36 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071026212306.40b4a12d@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox