From: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
satyam@infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 106/327] ufs: Fix mount check in ufs_fill_super()
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:30:11 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071027083011.GA21273@rain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710170626.l9H6QrYD006747@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:26:53PM -0700, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> From: Satyam Sharma <satyam@infradead.org>
>
> The current code skips the check to verify whether the filesystem was
> previously cleanly unmounted, if (flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_44BSD or
> UFS_ST_OLD. This looks like an inadvertent bug that slipped in due to
> parantheses in the compound conditional to me, especially given that
> ufs_get_fs_state() handles the UFS_ST_44BSD case perfectly well. So, let's
> fix the compound condition appropriately.
>
I wonder on what type of UFS do you test this patch?
NetBSD and FreeBSD do not use "fs_state", they use "fs_clean" flag,
only Solaris does check like this: fs_state + fs_time == FSOK.
That's why parentheses was like that.
At now with linux-2.6.24-rc1-git1, I get: fs need fsck,
but NetBSD's fsck says that's all ok.
I suggest revert this patch.
> Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <satyam@infradead.org>
> Cc: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
>
> fs/ufs/super.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff -puN fs/ufs/super.c~ufs-fix-sun-state-fix-mount-check-in-ufs_fill_super fs/ufs/super.c
> --- a/fs/ufs/super.c~ufs-fix-sun-state-fix-mount-check-in-ufs_fill_super
> +++ a/fs/ufs/super.c
> @@ -933,19 +933,20 @@ magic_found:
> goto again;
> }
>
> - sbi->s_flags = flags;/*after that line some functions use s_flags*/
> + /* Set sbi->s_flags here, used by ufs_get_fs_state() below */
> + sbi->s_flags = flags;
> ufs_print_super_stuff(sb, usb1, usb2, usb3);
>
> /*
> * Check, if file system was correctly unmounted.
> * If not, make it read only.
> */
> - if (((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_44BSD) ||
> - ((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_OLD) ||
> - (((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_SUN ||
> - (flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_SUNOS ||
> - (flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_SUNx86) &&
> - (ufs_get_fs_state(sb, usb1, usb3) == (UFS_FSOK - fs32_to_cpu(sb, usb1->fs_time))))) {
> + if ((((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_44BSD) ||
> + ((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_OLD) ||
> + ((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_SUN) ||
> + ((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_SUNOS) ||
> + ((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_SUNx86)) &&
> + (ufs_get_fs_state(sb, usb1, usb3) == (UFS_FSOK - fs32_to_cpu(sb, usb1->fs_time)))) {
> switch(usb1->fs_clean) {
> case UFS_FSCLEAN:
> UFSD("fs is clean\n");
> _
--
/Evgeniy
parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-27 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <200710170626.l9H6QrYD006747@imap1.linux-foundation.org>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071027083011.GA21273@rain \
--to=dushistov@mail.ru \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=satyam@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox