Re: Stringbuf, v2

Joe Perches
2007-10-24T21:20:10Z

On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 14:57 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> If you look at the patches, you'll see that they basically all have a
> wrapper around sb_printf that I was able to insert the GFP argument
> into, so I don't see this as a win.

I was hoping that each module/subsystem would not need a
separate wrapper and could use the plain sb_printf function.