From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1757747AbXJ2Rdb@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757747AbXJ2Rdb (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:33:31 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752721AbXJ2RdX
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:33:23 -0400
Received: from netops-testserver-4-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:42047 "EHLO
	relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751981AbXJ2RdW (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:33:22 -0400
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:33:16 -0700
From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: clameter@sgi.com, rientjes@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
       ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mel@csn.ul.ie
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option
Message-Id: <20071029103316.a68d00be.pj@sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <1193670056.5035.27.camel@localhost>
References: <alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710251540210.11929@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
	<alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710251541550.11929@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0710251635420.9635@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
	<alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710251648430.23810@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0710251725440.10197@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
	<20071025185506.8c373aa8.pj@sgi.com>
	<alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710251900080.8024@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
	<1193412644.5032.13.camel@localhost>
	<alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710261145400.11674@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
	<20071026120037.7b95a136.pj@sgi.com>
	<alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710261344180.6249@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
	<1193433239.5032.95.camel@localhost>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0710261415580.18139@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
	<1193433992.5032.102.camel@localhost>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0710261436070.18899@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
	<1193670056.5035.27.camel@localhost>
Organization: SGI
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Lee wrote:
> I only brought it up again because now you all are considering another
> nodemask per policy.

The patch David and I are discussing will replace the
cpuset_mems_allowed nodemask in struct mempolicy, not
add a new nodemask.  In other words, the meaning and
name of that existing nodemask will change, with no
change in the overall structure size.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401