* Linux kernel memory and split on 64-bit machines
@ 2007-10-29 11:20 Yoav Artzi
2007-10-29 12:11 ` Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yoav Artzi @ 2007-10-29 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi,
I am researching now about the Linux kernel memory on 64-bit (x86_64)
machines. I am looking into answering the following questions:
1. Is there a user-kernel split on 64-bit memories? If so, how is it
done? What is the size of each part?
2. Does kernel high memory exists on 64-bit machines?
3. How is it possible to detect in runtime the split and the size of the
physical memory?
Thanks,
Yoav
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Linux kernel memory and split on 64-bit machines
2007-10-29 11:20 Linux kernel memory and split on 64-bit machines Yoav Artzi
@ 2007-10-29 12:11 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <4725EC21.7000603@checkpoint.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2007-10-29 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yoav Artzi; +Cc: linux-kernel
Yoav Artzi <yoavar@checkpoint.com> writes:
> I am researching now about the Linux kernel memory on 64-bit (x86_64)
> machines. I am looking into answering the following questions:
>
> 1. Is there a user-kernel split on 64-bit memories? If so, how is it
> done? What is the size of each part?
See Documentation/x86_64/mm.txt. Note it changed in 2.6.11.
-Andi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Linux kernel memory and split on 64-bit machines
[not found] ` <4725F6F7.6020702@checkpoint.com>
@ 2007-10-29 15:48 ` Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2007-10-29 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yoav Artzi; +Cc: Andi Kleen, linux-kernel
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 05:06:31PM +0200, Yoav Artzi wrote:
> I don't know what befell me. I realized the foolishness of the questions
> a second after clicking the send button.
>
>
> Now, I just wonder what will happen when people will need more then
> 2^46bytes of memory. Any idea?
The CPU needs to be extended then beyond 48bit VA.
(actually it could be extended to 2^46.5 or so)
>
> Another two issues:
>
> 1. I see vmalloc() doesn't cover the entire possible space. Why is that?
It needs an reserved space for its virtual mappings.
>
> 2. How come user space gets 47bits and kernel only gets 46bits in direct
> mapping?
Half of the kernel space is reserved for special purposes
(vmalloc, ioremap etc.) That is not fixed and could be varied.
-Andi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-29 15:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-29 11:20 Linux kernel memory and split on 64-bit machines Yoav Artzi
2007-10-29 12:11 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <4725EC21.7000603@checkpoint.com>
[not found] ` <20071029150035.GA30851@one.firstfloor.org>
[not found] ` <4725F6F7.6020702@checkpoint.com>
2007-10-29 15:48 ` Andi Kleen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox