From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Martin Ebourne <fedora@ebourne.me.uk>,
Zou Nan hai <nanhai.zou@intel.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
stable@kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [stable] 2.6.23 boot failures on x86-64.
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:07:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071029180739.GA17595@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071029175014.GH7793@redhat.com>
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 01:50:14PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> We've had a number of people reporting that their x86-64s stopped booting
> when they moved to 2.6.23. It rebooted just after discovering the AGP bridge
> as a result of the IOMMU init.
>
> Martin tracked this down to the following commit.
>
>
> commit 2e1c49db4c640b35df13889b86b9d62215ade4b6
> Author: Zou Nan hai <nanhai.zou@intel.com>
> Date: Fri Jun 1 00:46:28 2007 -0700
>
> x86_64: allocate sparsemem memmap above 4G
>
> On systems with huge amount of physical memory, VFS cache and memory memmap
> may eat all available system memory under 4G, then the system may fail to
> allocate swiotlb bounce buffer.
>
> There was a fix for this issue in arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c, but that fix dose
> not cover sparsemem model.
>
> This patch add fix to sparsemem model by first try to allocate memmap above
> 4G.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zou Nan hai <nanhai.zou@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
> Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
>
>
> This should be probably be reverted for 2.6.23-stable, and either fixed
> properly in .24, or reverted there too.
I'll be glad to revert it in -stable, if it's also reverted in Linus's
tree first :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-29 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-29 17:50 2.6.23 boot failures on x86-64 Dave Jones
2007-10-29 18:07 ` Greg KH [this message]
2007-10-29 18:37 ` [stable] " Linus Torvalds
2007-10-29 19:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-29 19:52 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-10-29 20:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-29 20:23 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-10-29 20:27 ` Martin Ebourne
2007-10-29 18:18 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-29 18:47 ` Dave Jones
2007-10-29 19:03 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-29 19:43 ` Dave Jones
2007-10-29 19:56 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-29 21:21 ` Martin Ebourne
2007-10-31 6:04 ` Zou Nan hai
2007-10-31 6:19 ` Zou Nan hai
2007-10-29 20:06 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071029180739.GA17595@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=fedora@ebourne.me.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nanhai.zou@intel.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox