From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
stable@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [stable] 2.6.23 regression: top displaying 9999% CPU usage
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:04:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071029200425.GA830@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4725D2A5.1050908@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
* Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> We'll I initially thought of it and then I remembered that the
> regression occurs only when the accounting itself is inaccurate. I am
> tempted to ack the removal, but I would like to get input from others.
> Meanwhile, I'll try and see if I can fix the problem
i've got a patch from Peter queued up. (see below) This should fix the
main issue.
Ingo
-------------------->
Subject: sched: keep utime/stime monotonic
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
keep utime/stime monotonic.
cpustats use utime/stime as a ratio against sum_exec_runtime, as a
consequence it can happen - when the ratio changes faster than time
accumulates - that either can be appear to go backwards.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
fs/proc/array.c | 3 ++-
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/fork.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux/fs/proc/array.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/fs/proc/array.c
+++ linux/fs/proc/array.c
@@ -358,7 +358,8 @@ static cputime_t task_utime(struct task_
}
utime = (clock_t)temp;
- return clock_t_to_cputime(utime);
+ p->prev_utime = max(p->prev_utime, clock_t_to_cputime(utime));
+ return p->prev_utime;
}
static cputime_t task_stime(struct task_struct *p)
Index: linux/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ linux/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1009,6 +1009,7 @@ struct task_struct {
unsigned int rt_priority;
cputime_t utime, stime, utimescaled, stimescaled;
cputime_t gtime;
+ cputime_t prev_utime;
unsigned long nvcsw, nivcsw; /* context switch counts */
struct timespec start_time; /* monotonic time */
struct timespec real_start_time; /* boot based time */
Index: linux/kernel/fork.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/fork.c
+++ linux/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1056,6 +1056,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
p->gtime = cputime_zero;
p->utimescaled = cputime_zero;
p->stimescaled = cputime_zero;
+ p->prev_utime = cputime_zero;
#ifdef CONFIG_TASK_XACCT
p->rchar = 0; /* I/O counter: bytes read */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-29 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-12 20:31 2.6.23 regression: top displaying 9999% CPU usage Frans Pop
2007-10-12 21:22 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2007-10-13 7:53 ` Frans Pop
2007-10-14 20:36 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-10-16 8:29 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-10-16 9:30 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-16 10:11 ` Frans Pop
2007-10-16 10:38 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-16 10:34 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-10-16 12:59 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-29 12:05 ` Frans Pop
2007-10-29 12:31 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-29 20:04 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-10-29 20:33 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-10-29 20:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-29 21:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-29 21:22 ` Frans Pop
2007-10-29 21:43 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-29 23:19 ` Frans Pop
2007-10-29 23:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-30 20:22 ` Otavio Salvador
2007-10-29 23:24 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-30 5:56 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-10-30 6:00 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071029200425.GA830@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox