public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	stable@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [stable] 2.6.23 regression: top displaying 9999% CPU usage
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:04:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071029200425.GA830@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4725D2A5.1050908@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


* Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> We'll I initially thought of it and then I remembered that the 
> regression occurs only when the accounting itself is inaccurate. I am 
> tempted to ack the removal, but I would like to get input from others. 
> Meanwhile, I'll try and see if I can fix the problem

i've got a patch from Peter queued up. (see below) This should fix the 
main issue.

	Ingo

-------------------->
Subject: sched: keep utime/stime monotonic
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>

keep utime/stime monotonic.

cpustats use utime/stime as a ratio against sum_exec_runtime, as a
consequence it can happen - when the ratio changes faster than time
accumulates - that either can be appear to go backwards.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 fs/proc/array.c       |    3 ++-
 include/linux/sched.h |    1 +
 kernel/fork.c         |    1 +
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux/fs/proc/array.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/fs/proc/array.c
+++ linux/fs/proc/array.c
@@ -358,7 +358,8 @@ static cputime_t task_utime(struct task_
 	}
 	utime = (clock_t)temp;
 
-	return clock_t_to_cputime(utime);
+	p->prev_utime = max(p->prev_utime, clock_t_to_cputime(utime));
+	return p->prev_utime;
 }
 
 static cputime_t task_stime(struct task_struct *p)
Index: linux/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ linux/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1009,6 +1009,7 @@ struct task_struct {
 	unsigned int rt_priority;
 	cputime_t utime, stime, utimescaled, stimescaled;
 	cputime_t gtime;
+	cputime_t prev_utime;
 	unsigned long nvcsw, nivcsw; /* context switch counts */
 	struct timespec start_time; 		/* monotonic time */
 	struct timespec real_start_time;	/* boot based time */
Index: linux/kernel/fork.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/fork.c
+++ linux/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1056,6 +1056,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
 	p->gtime = cputime_zero;
 	p->utimescaled = cputime_zero;
 	p->stimescaled = cputime_zero;
+	p->prev_utime = cputime_zero;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_TASK_XACCT
 	p->rchar = 0;		/* I/O counter: bytes read */

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-29 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-12 20:31 2.6.23 regression: top displaying 9999% CPU usage Frans Pop
2007-10-12 21:22 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2007-10-13  7:53   ` Frans Pop
2007-10-14 20:36     ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-10-16  8:29       ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-10-16  9:30         ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-16 10:11           ` Frans Pop
2007-10-16 10:38             ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-16 10:34           ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-10-16 12:59             ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-29 12:05               ` Frans Pop
2007-10-29 12:31                 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-29 20:04                   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-10-29 20:33                     ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-10-29 20:41                       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-29 21:11                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-29 21:22                         ` Frans Pop
2007-10-29 21:43                     ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-29 23:19                       ` Frans Pop
2007-10-29 23:22                         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-30 20:22                           ` Otavio Salvador
2007-10-29 23:24                         ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-30  5:56                       ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-10-30  6:00                         ` Balbir Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071029200425.GA830@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=elendil@planet.nl \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox