public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Jones <tonyj@suse.de>
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	chrisw@sous-sol.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: clear thread flag for new children
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:15:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071029231529.GB15210@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710291804.31784.sgrubb@redhat.com>

On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:04:31PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:

> If the child does not have the TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT flag, it never goes into
> audit_syscall_entry. It becomes unauditable.

True but a task where current->audit_context == NULL is going to immediately
BUG out in audit_syscall_entry.  This is why the invocations of 
audit_syscall_entry() are conditional on current->audit_context.

> So when audit is re-enabled, how do you make that task auditable?

No idea. How do you do it currently? HINT: current->audit_context == NULL
for these tasks.  If !audit_enabled, then audit_alloc() is not going to 
allocate an audit_context for the task.

I'm very curious how you think one of these tasks becomes auditable later
on once audit is re-enabled,  regardless of the value of TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT.

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-29 23:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-26 20:42 [PATCH] audit: clear thread flag for new children Tony Jones
2007-10-26 22:42 ` Chris Wright
2007-10-27 14:21 ` Steve Grubb
2007-10-29 17:20   ` Tony Jones
2007-10-29 22:04     ` Steve Grubb
2007-10-29 23:15       ` Tony Jones [this message]
2007-11-01 14:33         ` Steve Grubb
2007-11-01 17:23           ` Tony Jones
2007-11-01 18:34             ` Steve Grubb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071029231529.GB15210@suse.de \
    --to=tonyj@suse.de \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox