From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756436AbXJ2XW5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:22:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753924AbXJ2XWs (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:22:48 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:44121 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755870AbXJ2XWr (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:22:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:22:19 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Frans Pop Cc: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Christian Borntraeger , Chuck Ebbert , Greg KH , stable@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [stable] 2.6.23 regression: top displaying 9999% CPU usage Message-ID: <20071029232219.GA12446@elte.hu> References: <200710122231.50739.elendil@planet.nl> <20071029200425.GA830@elte.hu> <20071029214321.GA25669@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <200710300019.28871.elendil@planet.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200710300019.28871.elendil@planet.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7-deb -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0004] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 29 October 2007, Balbir Singh wrote: > > We'll also need this additional patch (untested), > > OK. Both patches together do the trick. Gave it a nice long test run and got > no more weirdness. > Tested-by: Frans Pop cool, thanks! I've queued it up for the next scheduler batch. Ingo