From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Only show RESOURCES_64BIT on relevant architectures
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 06:13:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071030121315.GK32359@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071030114221.GA24392@linux-mips.org>
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:42:21AM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 02:37:19AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 10:03:16PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > > same HW platform that you want to run with just 32-bit phys (for
> > > performance).
> >
> > Have you measured what the performance difference is?
>
> So that's 5668, 256 bytes data and 128 bytes of bss for a total of 6052
> bytes. Not a whole lot but I still fear some users on the most
> claustrophobic systems will mind.
Oh, sure, I'm not saying I thought there would be no size difference; I
was just bemused at the suggestion there was a performance difference.
Unless "won't fit in ROM any more" is considered a performance problem ;-)
--
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-30 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-28 20:15 [PATCH] Only show RESOURCES_64BIT on relevant architectures Kyle McMartin
2007-10-29 1:09 ` David Miller
2007-10-29 15:11 ` Kyle McMartin
2007-10-29 8:10 ` Russell King
2007-10-29 15:21 ` Kyle McMartin
2007-10-29 15:50 ` Russell King
2007-10-30 2:48 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-10-30 3:03 ` Kumar Gala
2007-10-30 8:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-10-30 11:42 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-10-30 12:13 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2007-10-30 14:14 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-10-30 20:00 ` Russell King
2007-10-30 14:19 ` Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071030121315.GK32359@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=kyle@mcmartin.ca \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox