From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758184AbXJ3TsL (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:48:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755680AbXJ3Tr5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:47:57 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-4-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:37611 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755018AbXJ3Tr4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:47:56 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:47:51 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: Andi Kleen Cc: Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, rientjes@google.com, clameter@sgi.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option Message-Id: <20071030124751.0a2d50b2.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <200710292208.30033.ak@suse.de> References: <1193674988.5035.93.camel@localhost> <20071029123558.fb077ca9.pj@sgi.com> <200710292208.30033.ak@suse.de> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi, Christoph, or whomever: Are there any good regression tests of mempolicy functionality? This patch I'm coding is delicate enough that I probably broke something. It would be nice to catch it sooner rather than later. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401