From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1757213AbXJ3Xqj@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757213AbXJ3Xqj (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:46:39 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751878AbXJ3Xqb
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:46:31 -0400
Received: from netops-testserver-4-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:43694 "EHLO
	relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751262AbXJ3Xqa (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:46:30 -0400
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:46:28 -0700
From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, clameter@sgi.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
       ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option
Message-Id: <20071030164628.dcf38c5f.pj@sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710301554450.15640@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710251540210.11929@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
	<alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710251541550.11929@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0710251635420.9635@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
	<alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710251648430.23810@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0710251725440.10197@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
	<20071025185506.8c373aa8.pj@sgi.com>
	<alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710251900080.8024@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
	<1193412644.5032.13.camel@localhost>
	<alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710261145400.11674@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
	<20071026120037.7b95a136.pj@sgi.com>
	<alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710261344180.6249@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
	<1193433239.5032.95.camel@localhost>
	<alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710261416160.11594@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
	<1193434278.5032.106.camel@localhost>
	<alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710261436140.16966@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
	<1193670617.5035.38.camel@localhost>
	<alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710301554450.15640@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Organization: SGI
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

David wrote:
> but the remap certainly doesn't help respect the intent of the
> application and the mempolicies they have set up when influenced
> by an outside entity such as cpusets.

... guess that depends on the intent, doesn't it?

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401