From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, clameter@sgi.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, ak@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:03:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071030170343.fac64402.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710301615580.19750@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
David wrote:
> That's what Choice C is intended to replace
Yes, one remaps nodes it can't provide, and the other removes
nodes it can't provide.
Yup - that's a logical difference. So ... I would think that
the only solution that would be satisfactory to apps that require
specific hardware nodes would be to simply not move them in the
first place. If you do that, then none of these Choices matter
in the slightest.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-31 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-25 22:54 [patch 1/2] cpusets: extract mmarray loading from update_nodemask David Rientjes
2007-10-25 22:54 ` [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option David Rientjes
2007-10-25 23:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-25 23:56 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-26 0:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-26 1:55 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-26 2:11 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-26 2:29 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-26 2:45 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-26 3:14 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-26 3:58 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-26 4:34 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-26 15:37 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-26 17:04 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-26 17:28 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-26 20:21 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-10-26 20:25 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-26 20:33 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-10-26 15:30 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-26 18:46 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-26 19:00 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-26 20:45 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-26 21:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-26 21:08 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-26 21:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-26 21:15 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-26 21:13 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-26 21:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-26 21:26 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-26 21:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-29 15:00 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-29 17:33 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-29 17:46 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-29 20:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-26 21:18 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-26 21:31 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-26 21:39 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-27 1:07 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-27 1:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-27 2:41 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-27 2:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-27 5:16 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-27 6:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-27 8:36 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-27 17:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-27 20:59 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-27 17:50 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-27 23:19 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-28 18:19 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-28 23:46 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-29 1:04 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-29 4:27 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-29 4:47 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-29 5:45 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-29 7:00 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-29 7:26 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-30 22:53 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-30 23:17 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-30 23:25 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-31 0:03 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-31 0:05 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-29 7:15 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-30 23:12 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-30 23:44 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-30 23:53 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-31 0:29 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-29 16:54 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-29 19:40 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-29 19:45 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-29 19:57 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-29 20:02 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-27 17:45 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-27 21:22 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-29 15:10 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-29 18:41 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-29 19:01 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-30 23:17 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-31 0:03 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2007-10-30 22:57 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-30 23:46 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-26 20:43 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-26 15:18 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-26 17:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-26 18:45 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-26 19:02 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-27 19:16 ` David Rientjes
2007-10-29 16:23 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-29 17:35 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-29 19:35 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-29 20:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-29 21:08 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-29 22:48 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-30 19:47 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-30 20:20 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-30 20:26 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-30 20:27 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-26 1:13 ` Paul Jackson
2007-10-26 1:30 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071030170343.fac64402.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox