From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759880AbXJaAEd (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:04:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756810AbXJaADx (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:03:53 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:54248 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759591AbXJaADv (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:03:51 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:03:49 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: David Rientjes Cc: clameter@sgi.com, Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option Message-Id: <20071030170349.11f3aa4a.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20071026180713.aeedfac2.pj@sgi.com> <20071026194144.6042316a.pj@sgi.com> <20071027161955.e9d4d2db.pj@sgi.com> <20071028164637.8d1b45b0.pj@sgi.com> <20071028212745.57a7db67.pj@sgi.com> <20071028224533.df924291.pj@sgi.com> <20071029002602.34866d8c.pj@sgi.com> <20071030161728.40f27300.pj@sgi.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David wrote: > Of course there's actual and real world examples of this, because right > now we're not meeting the full intent of the application. Please describe one, an actual one, not a hypothetical one, of which you have personal knowledge. There are many refinements we could add, an endless stream of them. Each one adds a burden to those who didn't need it. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401