From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysfs: add filter function to groups
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:55:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071031035506.GH14910@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1193768743.3321.91.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:25:43PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 18:58 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> > James Bottomley wrote:
> > >> > struct attribute_group {
> > >> > const char *name;
> > >> > + int (*filter_show)(struct kobject *, int);
> >
> > > Actually, it returns a true/false value indicating whether the given
> > > attribute should be displayed.
> >
> > How about this:
> >
> > int (*is_visible)(...);
>
> OK, so is this latest revision acceptable to everyone?
>
> James
>
> Index: BUILD-2.6/fs/sysfs/group.c
> ===================================================================
> --- BUILD-2.6.orig/fs/sysfs/group.c 2007-10-28 17:27:04.000000000 -0500
> +++ BUILD-2.6/fs/sysfs/group.c 2007-10-30 12:35:47.000000000 -0500
> @@ -16,25 +16,31 @@
> #include "sysfs.h"
>
>
> -static void remove_files(struct sysfs_dirent *dir_sd,
> +static void remove_files(struct sysfs_dirent *dir_sd, struct kobject *kobj,
> const struct attribute_group *grp)
> {
> struct attribute *const* attr;
> + int i;
>
> - for (attr = grp->attrs; *attr; attr++)
> - sysfs_hash_and_remove(dir_sd, (*attr)->name);
> + for (i = 0, attr = grp->attrs; *attr; i++, attr++)
> + if (grp->is_visible &&
> + grp->is_visible(kobj, *attr, i))
> + sysfs_hash_and_remove(dir_sd, (*attr)->name);
Hm, doesn't this break for the zillions of attribute groups that do not
have the is_visible function set?
> -static int create_files(struct sysfs_dirent *dir_sd,
> +static int create_files(struct sysfs_dirent *dir_sd, struct kobject *kobj,
> const struct attribute_group *grp)
> {
> struct attribute *const* attr;
> - int error = 0;
> + int error = 0, i;
>
> - for (attr = grp->attrs; *attr && !error; attr++)
> - error = sysfs_add_file(dir_sd, *attr, SYSFS_KOBJ_ATTR);
> + for (i = 0, attr = grp->attrs; *attr && !error; i++, attr++)
> + if (grp->is_visible &&
> + grp->is_visible(kobj, *attr, i))
> + error |=
> + sysfs_add_file(dir_sd, *attr, SYSFS_KOBJ_ATTR);
Same problem here, if grp->is_visible is not set, sysfs_add_file() would
never be called, right?
Other than the logic problem (I think), I have no issue with this idea
at all. Care to redo this so it works?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-31 3:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-29 15:16 [PATCH] sysfs: add filter function to groups James Bottomley
2007-10-29 16:54 ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-29 16:57 ` James Bottomley
2007-10-29 17:18 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-10-29 17:24 ` James Bottomley
2007-10-29 17:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-29 17:29 ` James Bottomley
2007-10-30 9:00 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-10-30 8:55 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-10-29 17:27 ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-29 17:28 ` James Bottomley
2007-10-29 17:43 ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-29 17:58 ` Stefan Richter
2007-10-29 18:12 ` James Bottomley
2007-10-30 18:25 ` James Bottomley
2007-10-30 19:31 ` Stefan Richter
2007-10-30 19:47 ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-31 0:40 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2007-10-31 2:01 ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-31 11:28 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2007-10-31 3:55 ` Greg KH [this message]
2007-10-31 9:41 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-10-31 9:52 ` Stefan Richter
2007-10-31 10:20 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-10-31 10:37 ` Stefan Richter
2007-10-31 12:19 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-10-31 14:38 ` James Bottomley
2007-10-31 17:29 ` Greg KH
2007-11-04 14:12 ` James Bottomley
2007-11-04 19:06 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071031035506.GH14910@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox