linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, benjamin.serebrin@amd.com
Subject: Re: Whats the purpose of get_cycles_sync()
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:23:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071031102346.GE29700@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071030220209.GA21142@suse.cz>

Hi Vojtech,

On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:02:09PM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> The K8's still guarantee that subsequent RDTSCs return increasing
> values, even if the processor reorders them.
> 
> What could have been happening then was that the RDTSC instruction might
> have been reordered by the CPU out of the seqlock, causing trouble in
> the calculation.
> 
> Anyway, adding the CPUID didn't solve all the problems we've seen back
> then, and so far none of the approaches for using TSC without acquiring
> a spinlock on multi-socket AMD boxes worked 100% correctly.

Can you tell me more about the problems you have seen or give me a
pointer to a mail discussion regarding that problems? Can you also
provide your test program to me please? I want to understand these
problems a bit better.

Joerg

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-10-31 10:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-30 17:44 Whats the purpose of get_cycles_sync() Joerg Roedel
2007-10-30 20:21 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-30 22:02   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2007-10-30 22:42     ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-31 10:23     ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2007-10-31 10:18   ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071031102346.GE29700@8bytes.org \
    --to=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=benjamin.serebrin@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).