From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Duane Griffin <duaneg@dghda.com>,
linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.23 regression: accessing invalid mmap'ed memory from gdb causes unkillable spinning
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:19:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071031151934.GA19211@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0710310756220.30120@woody.linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 08:11:10AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >
> > However I actually don't really like how this all works. I don't like that
> > filemap.c should have to know about ptrace, or exactly what ptrace wants here.
>
> It shouldn't. It should just fail when it fails. Then, handle_mm_fault()
> should return an error code, which should cause get_user_pages() to return
> an error code. Which should make ptrace just stop.
>
> So I think your patch is wrong. mm/filemap.c should *not* care about who
> does the fault. I think the proper patch is something untested like the
> appended...
Well the patch is right, in the context of the regression I introduced
(and so it should probably go into 2.6.23).
I'd love to get rid of that outside data content crap if possible in
2.6.24. I think you're the one who has the best feeling for the ptrace
cases we have in the VM, so I trust you ;)
> > It's a bit hairy to force insert page into pagecache and pte into pagetables
> > here, given the races.
>
> It's also wrong. They shouldn't be in the page cache, since that can cause
> problems with truncate etc. Maybe it doesn't any more, but it's reasonable
> to believe that a page outside of i_size should not exist.
No I believe it could still be a problem (and at least, it is quite
fragile).
> > In access_process_vm, can't we just zero fill in the case of a sigbus? Linus?
> > That will also avoid changing applicatoin behaviour due to a gdb read...
>
> access_process_vm() should just return how many bytes it could fill (which
> means a truncated copy - very including zero bytes - for an error), and
> the caller should decide what the right thing to do is.
>
> But who knows, maybe I missed something.
I hope it works.
> Duane? Does this fix things for you?
>
> Linus
>
> ---
> mm/filemap.c | 13 ++-----------
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index 9940895..188cf5f 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -1300,7 +1300,7 @@ int filemap_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf)
>
> size = (i_size_read(inode) + PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> if (vmf->pgoff >= size)
> - goto outside_data_content;
> + return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
>
> /* If we don't want any read-ahead, don't bother */
> if (VM_RandomReadHint(vma))
> @@ -1377,7 +1377,7 @@ retry_find:
> if (unlikely(vmf->pgoff >= size)) {
> unlock_page(page);
> page_cache_release(page);
> - goto outside_data_content;
> + return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1388,15 +1388,6 @@ retry_find:
> vmf->page = page;
> return ret | VM_FAULT_LOCKED;
>
> -outside_data_content:
> - /*
> - * An external ptracer can access pages that normally aren't
> - * accessible..
> - */
> - if (vma->vm_mm == current->mm)
> - return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
> -
> - /* Fall through to the non-read-ahead case */
> no_cached_page:
> /*
> * We're only likely to ever get here if MADV_RANDOM is in
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-31 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-31 0:45 2.6.23 regression: accessing invalid mmap'ed memory from gdb causes unkillable spinning Duane Griffin
2007-10-31 4:19 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-31 10:27 ` Duane Griffin
2007-10-31 15:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-31 15:19 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2007-10-31 15:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-31 17:19 ` Duane Griffin
2007-10-31 22:55 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-31 23:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-01 2:37 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-01 15:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-01 15:47 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-01 16:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-01 23:56 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-02 1:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-02 6:30 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-31 6:42 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-31 6:56 ` David Miller
2007-10-31 7:41 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-31 7:44 ` David Miller
2007-11-02 5:02 ` David Miller
2007-11-02 10:45 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-02 15:36 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071031151934.GA19211@wotan.suse.de \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=duaneg@dghda.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox