From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] sched: move the group scheduling primitives around
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:10:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071031211248.440554000@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20071031211030.310581000@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: sched-move-group.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 6092 bytes --]
The next patch will make sched_slice group aware, reorder the group scheduling
primitives so that they don't need fwd declarations.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
CC: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/sched_fair.c | 190 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 92 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -80,6 +80,11 @@ const_debug unsigned int sysctl_sched_mi
* CFS operations on generic schedulable entities:
*/
+static inline struct task_struct *task_of(struct sched_entity *se)
+{
+ return container_of(se, struct task_struct, se);
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
/* cpu runqueue to which this cfs_rq is attached */
@@ -91,6 +96,54 @@ static inline struct rq *rq_of(struct cf
/* An entity is a task if it doesn't "own" a runqueue */
#define entity_is_task(se) (!se->my_q)
+/* Walk up scheduling entities hierarchy */
+#define for_each_sched_entity(se) \
+ for (; se; se = se->parent)
+
+static inline struct cfs_rq *task_cfs_rq(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ return p->se.cfs_rq;
+}
+
+/* runqueue on which this entity is (to be) queued */
+static inline struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq_of(struct sched_entity *se)
+{
+ return se->cfs_rq;
+}
+
+/* runqueue "owned" by this group */
+static inline struct cfs_rq *group_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *grp)
+{
+ return grp->my_q;
+}
+
+/* Given a group's cfs_rq on one cpu, return its corresponding cfs_rq on
+ * another cpu ('this_cpu')
+ */
+static inline struct cfs_rq *cpu_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int this_cpu)
+{
+ return cfs_rq->tg->cfs_rq[this_cpu];
+}
+
+/* Iterate thr' all leaf cfs_rq's on a runqueue */
+#define for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) \
+ list_for_each_entry(cfs_rq, &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list, leaf_cfs_rq_list)
+
+/* Do the two (enqueued) entities belong to the same group ? */
+static inline int
+is_same_group(struct sched_entity *se, struct sched_entity *pse)
+{
+ if (se->cfs_rq == pse->cfs_rq)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline struct sched_entity *parent_entity(struct sched_entity *se)
+{
+ return se->parent;
+}
+
#else /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
static inline struct rq *rq_of(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
@@ -100,13 +153,49 @@ static inline struct rq *rq_of(struct cf
#define entity_is_task(se) 1
-#endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
+#define for_each_sched_entity(se) \
+ for (; se; se = NULL)
-static inline struct task_struct *task_of(struct sched_entity *se)
+static inline struct cfs_rq *task_cfs_rq(struct task_struct *p)
{
- return container_of(se, struct task_struct, se);
+ return &task_rq(p)->cfs;
}
+static inline struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq_of(struct sched_entity *se)
+{
+ struct task_struct *p = task_of(se);
+ struct rq *rq = task_rq(p);
+
+ return &rq->cfs;
+}
+
+/* runqueue "owned" by this group */
+static inline struct cfs_rq *group_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *grp)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static inline struct cfs_rq *cpu_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int this_cpu)
+{
+ return &cpu_rq(this_cpu)->cfs;
+}
+
+#define for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) \
+ for (cfs_rq = &rq->cfs; cfs_rq; cfs_rq = NULL)
+
+static inline int
+is_same_group(struct sched_entity *se, struct sched_entity *pse)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+static inline struct sched_entity *parent_entity(struct sched_entity *se)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
+
/**************************************************************
* Scheduling class tree data structure manipulation methods:
@@ -626,101 +715,6 @@ static void entity_tick(struct cfs_rq *c
* CFS operations on tasks:
*/
-#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
-
-/* Walk up scheduling entities hierarchy */
-#define for_each_sched_entity(se) \
- for (; se; se = se->parent)
-
-static inline struct cfs_rq *task_cfs_rq(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- return p->se.cfs_rq;
-}
-
-/* runqueue on which this entity is (to be) queued */
-static inline struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq_of(struct sched_entity *se)
-{
- return se->cfs_rq;
-}
-
-/* runqueue "owned" by this group */
-static inline struct cfs_rq *group_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *grp)
-{
- return grp->my_q;
-}
-
-/* Given a group's cfs_rq on one cpu, return its corresponding cfs_rq on
- * another cpu ('this_cpu')
- */
-static inline struct cfs_rq *cpu_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int this_cpu)
-{
- return cfs_rq->tg->cfs_rq[this_cpu];
-}
-
-/* Iterate thr' all leaf cfs_rq's on a runqueue */
-#define for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) \
- list_for_each_entry(cfs_rq, &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list, leaf_cfs_rq_list)
-
-/* Do the two (enqueued) entities belong to the same group ? */
-static inline int
-is_same_group(struct sched_entity *se, struct sched_entity *pse)
-{
- if (se->cfs_rq == pse->cfs_rq)
- return 1;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static inline struct sched_entity *parent_entity(struct sched_entity *se)
-{
- return se->parent;
-}
-
-#else /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
-
-#define for_each_sched_entity(se) \
- for (; se; se = NULL)
-
-static inline struct cfs_rq *task_cfs_rq(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- return &task_rq(p)->cfs;
-}
-
-static inline struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq_of(struct sched_entity *se)
-{
- struct task_struct *p = task_of(se);
- struct rq *rq = task_rq(p);
-
- return &rq->cfs;
-}
-
-/* runqueue "owned" by this group */
-static inline struct cfs_rq *group_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *grp)
-{
- return NULL;
-}
-
-static inline struct cfs_rq *cpu_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int this_cpu)
-{
- return &cpu_rq(this_cpu)->cfs;
-}
-
-#define for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) \
- for (cfs_rq = &rq->cfs; cfs_rq; cfs_rq = NULL)
-
-static inline int
-is_same_group(struct sched_entity *se, struct sched_entity *pse)
-{
- return 1;
-}
-
-static inline struct sched_entity *parent_entity(struct sched_entity *se)
-{
- return NULL;
-}
-
-#endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
-
/*
* The enqueue_task method is called before nr_running is
* increased. Here we update the fair scheduling stats and
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-31 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-31 21:10 [PATCH 0/6] various scheduler patches Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-31 21:10 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2007-10-31 21:10 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched: make sched_slice() group scheduling savvy Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-01 11:31 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-01 11:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-01 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-01 12:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-01 12:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-01 16:31 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-11-01 16:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-31 21:10 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched: high-res preemption tick Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-31 21:53 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-31 22:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-01 10:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-31 21:10 ` [PATCH 4/6] sched: sched_rt_entity Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-31 21:10 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched: SCHED_FIFO/SCHED_RR watchdog timer Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-31 21:49 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-31 22:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-03 18:16 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-31 21:10 ` [PATCH 6/6] sched: place_entity() comments Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-01 8:29 ` [PATCH 0/6] various scheduler patches Ingo Molnar
2007-11-01 10:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071031211248.440554000@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox