public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com>
Cc: i2c@lm-sensors.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Blackfin I2C/TWI driver: add missing pin mux operation
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 10:51:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071101105154.6400669c@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1193736797-9005-3-git-send-email-bryan.wu@analog.com>

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:33:17 +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:

Please include a description of the bug your patch is fixing. "missing
pin mux operation" doesn't tell me much.

> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bfin-twi.c |   49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bfin-twi.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bfin-twi.c
> index acae7ef..832ba66 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bfin-twi.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bfin-twi.c
> @@ -38,8 +38,18 @@
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/blackfin.h>
> +#include <asm/portmux.h>
>  #include <asm/irq.h>
>  
> +#define DRV_NAME	"i2c-bfin-twi"
> +#define DRV_AUTHOR	"Sonic Zhang, Bryan Wu"
> +#define DRV_DESC	"Blackfin BF5xx on-chip I2C TWI Contoller Driver"
> +#define DRV_VERSION	"1.8"
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR(DRV_AUTHOR);
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION(DRV_DESC);
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +

I pretty much doubt that these changes have anything to do with the bug
you're fixing -> separate patch please.

>  #define POLL_TIMEOUT       (2 * HZ)
>  
>  /* SMBus mode*/
> @@ -67,6 +77,7 @@ struct bfin_twi_iface {
>  	int			msg_num;
>  	int			cur_msg;
>  	u32			regs_base;
> +	int			bus_num;
>  };
>  
>  
> @@ -93,6 +104,24 @@ DEFINE_TWI_REG(XMT_DATA16, 0x84)
>  DEFINE_TWI_REG(RCV_DATA8, 0x88)
>  DEFINE_TWI_REG(RCV_DATA16, 0x8C)
>  
> +static int setup_pin_mux(int action, struct bfin_twi_iface *iface)
> +{
> +
> +	u16 pin_req[2][3] = {

Could be declared const?

> +		{P_TWI0_SCL, P_TWI0_SDA, 0},
> +		{P_TWI1_SCL, P_TWI1_SDA, 0},
> +	};
> +
> +	if (action) {
> +		if (peripheral_request_list(pin_req[iface->bus_num], DRV_NAME))
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +	} else {
> +		peripheral_free_list(pin_req[iface->bus_num]);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static void bfin_twi_handle_interrupt(struct bfin_twi_iface *iface)
>  {
>  	unsigned short twi_int_status = read_INT_STAT(iface);
> @@ -310,8 +339,7 @@ static int bfin_twi_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
>  
>  	pmsg = &msgs[0];
>  	if (pmsg->flags & I2C_M_TEN) {
> -		dev_err(&(adap->dev), "i2c-bfin-twi: 10 bits addr "
> -			"not supported !\n");
> +		dev_err(&(adap->dev), "10 bits addr not supported !\n");

You're fixing an error introduced by the previous patch, please fix it
in the original patch instead.

>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -645,6 +673,7 @@ static int i2c_bfin_twi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto out_error_no_irq;
>  	}
>  
> +	iface->bus_num = pdev->id;
>  	init_timer(&(iface->timeout_timer));
>  	iface->timeout_timer.function = bfin_twi_timeout;
>  	iface->timeout_timer.data = (unsigned long)iface;
> @@ -657,11 +686,12 @@ static int i2c_bfin_twi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	p_adap->class = I2C_CLASS_ALL;
>  	p_adap->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
>  
> +	setup_pin_mux(1, iface);
> +
>  	rc = request_irq(iface->irq, bfin_twi_interrupt_entry,
>  		IRQF_DISABLED, pdev->name, iface);
>  	if (rc) {
> -		dev_err(&(pdev->dev), "i2c-bfin-twi: can't get IRQ %d !\n",
> -			iface->irq);
> +		dev_err(&(pdev->dev), "can't get IRQ %d !\n", iface->irq);
>  		rc = -ENODEV;
>  		goto out_error_req_irq;
>  	}
> @@ -684,8 +714,8 @@ static int i2c_bfin_twi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	else
>  		platform_set_drvdata(pdev, iface);
>  
> -	dev_info(&(pdev->dev), "Blackfin I2C TWI driver, regs_base @ 0x%08x\n",
> -		iface->regs_base);
> +	dev_info(&(pdev->dev), "%s, Version %s, regs_base@0x%08x\n",
> +		DRV_DESC, DRV_VERSION, iface->regs_base);
>  
>  	return rc;
>  
> @@ -707,6 +737,7 @@ static int i2c_bfin_twi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	i2c_del_adapter(&(iface->adap));
>  	free_irq(iface->irq, iface);
> +	setup_pin_mux(0, iface);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -717,7 +748,7 @@ static struct platform_driver i2c_bfin_twi_driver = {
>  	.suspend	= i2c_bfin_twi_suspend,
>  	.resume		= i2c_bfin_twi_resume,
>  	.driver		= {
> -		.name	= "i2c-bfin-twi",
> +		.name	= DRV_NAME,
>  		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
>  	},
>  };
> @@ -732,9 +763,5 @@ static void __exit i2c_bfin_twi_exit(void)
>  	platform_driver_unregister(&i2c_bfin_twi_driver);
>  }
>  
> -MODULE_AUTHOR("Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>");
> -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("I2C-Bus adapter routines for Blackfin TWI");
> -MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> -
>  module_init(i2c_bfin_twi_init);
>  module_exit(i2c_bfin_twi_exit);


-- 
Jean Delvare

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-01  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-30  9:33 [PATCH 0/2] Blackfin I2C/TWI driver updates Bryan Wu
2007-10-30  9:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] Blackfin I2C/TWI driver: Add platform_resource interface to support multi-port TWI controllers Bryan Wu
2007-11-01  9:44   ` Jean Delvare
2007-10-30  9:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] Blackfin I2C/TWI driver: add missing pin mux operation Bryan Wu
2007-11-01  9:51   ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2007-11-01 17:51   ` Mike Frysinger
2007-11-02  1:48     ` Bryan Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071101105154.6400669c@hyperion.delvare \
    --to=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=bryan.wu@analog.com \
    --cc=i2c@lm-sensors.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox