From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Bo Brant?n <bosse@acc.umu.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 11:26:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071103162640.GS17536@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.64.0711031329490.397338@stalin.acc.umu.se>
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 01:31:49PM +0100, Bo Brant?n wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I tryed different linux distributions on a computer with an Intel Core 2
> Quad and I noticed that the 64-bit versions was at least 10 times slower
> than the 32-bit versions, to boot the system took over 20 minutes in 64-bit
> mode and then even scrolling text at the command prompt felt slow, however
> Vista 64 boots as fast as Vista 32 on the same computer. So I would like to
> ask if this is a known problem or if there is some simple misstake I can
> have done.
>
> I used live cd's from gentoo and ubunto and at least ubuntu has a rather
> new kernel, also dmesg doesn't show anything strange, for example is the
> bogomips figure the same as when booting in 32-bit mode.
This is typically due to a problem with the setup of your MTRRs. Try
booting with mem=nnnM where nnn is some number smaller than your
actual amount of memory.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-03 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-03 12:31 x86_64 ten times slower than i386 Bo Brantén
2007-11-03 16:26 ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2007-11-03 22:38 ` Bo Brantén
2007-11-03 22:54 ` Matt Mackall
2007-11-03 23:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-05 8:06 ` Joseph Fannin
2007-11-05 10:15 ` Bo Brantén
2007-11-05 16:00 ` Bo Brantén
2007-11-05 17:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-05 18:46 ` Bo Brantén
2007-11-05 19:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] ` <2c0942db0711050832t5207ea8bib1f75e59e071ade2@mail.gmail.com>
2007-11-06 0:26 ` Andi Kleen
2007-11-06 1:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-06 19:40 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-11-06 19:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-06 19:53 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-11-07 18:38 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-11-10 13:41 ` Bo Brantén
2007-11-05 17:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071103162640.GS17536@waste.org \
--to=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=bosse@acc.umu.se \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox