public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Bo Brant?n <bosse@acc.umu.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 11:26:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071103162640.GS17536@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.64.0711031329490.397338@stalin.acc.umu.se>

On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 01:31:49PM +0100, Bo Brant?n wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I tryed different linux distributions on a computer with an Intel Core 2 
> Quad and I noticed that the 64-bit versions was at least 10 times slower 
> than the 32-bit versions, to boot the system took over 20 minutes in 64-bit 
> mode and then even scrolling text at the command prompt felt slow, however 
> Vista 64 boots as fast as Vista 32 on the same computer. So I would like to 
> ask if this is a known problem or if there is some simple misstake I can 
> have done.
> 
> I used live cd's from gentoo and ubunto and at least ubuntu has a rather 
> new kernel, also dmesg doesn't show anything strange, for example is the 
> bogomips figure the same as when booting in 32-bit mode.

This is typically due to a problem with the setup of your MTRRs. Try
booting with mem=nnnM where nnn is some number smaller than your
actual amount of memory.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-03 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-03 12:31 x86_64 ten times slower than i386 Bo Brantén
2007-11-03 16:26 ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2007-11-03 22:38   ` Bo Brantén
2007-11-03 22:54     ` Matt Mackall
2007-11-03 23:30     ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-05  8:06     ` Joseph Fannin
2007-11-05 10:15     ` Bo Brantén
2007-11-05 16:00       ` Bo Brantén
2007-11-05 17:23         ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-05 18:46           ` Bo Brantén
2007-11-05 19:11             ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found]         ` <2c0942db0711050832t5207ea8bib1f75e59e071ade2@mail.gmail.com>
2007-11-06  0:26           ` Andi Kleen
2007-11-06  1:19             ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-06 19:40               ` Willy Tarreau
2007-11-06 19:50                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-06 19:53                   ` Willy Tarreau
2007-11-07 18:38             ` Jesse Barnes
2007-11-10 13:41         ` Bo Brantén
2007-11-05 17:22       ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071103162640.GS17536@waste.org \
    --to=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=bosse@acc.umu.se \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox