public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Sam Ravnborg" <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	"Thomas Bächler" <thomas@archlinux.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc1-82798a1 compile failure (x86_64)
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 11:04:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071104100429.GA12311@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071104020217.GJ12045@stusta.de>


* Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 01:11:49PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 11:04:36AM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> > > Thomas Bächler schrieb:
> > > > 
> > > > I just remembered, a friend of mine got it to compile with the exact
> > > > same toolchain, but with a different configuration (which I don't have).
> > > > He used a snapshot tarball from yesterday though, not the git tree.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I found the problem and eliminated it. While this is my own fault, it is
> > > still a bug in either the kernel or the build system: I had CFLAGS set
> > > to "-Wall -O3 -march=native -pipe". I always thought the kernel would
> > > ignore those and set its own CFLAGS, but I was wrong. Either the -O3 or
> > > the -march=native break the build process on gcc 4.2.2.
> > > 
> > The kernel will now honour the users CFLAGS setting as you just discovered.
> > The flags will be appended to the flags specified by the kernel.
> >...
> 
> I think this should be changed:
> 
> I also have CFLAGS set on some computers in my environments since for 
> packages using GNU autoconf that's the correct way to set the compiler 
> flags.
> 
> The kernel already sets all flags correctly, and a user wanting to 
> change the flags for the kernel is an exception with very special 
> needs (I'd even claim so special that he could simply edit the 
> Makefile...).
> 
> Using the *FLAGS automatically in the kernel doesn't sound right, can 
> we prefix all environment variables the kernel honours with KERNEL_ ?

this _must_ be changed before v2.6.24 is released. Thomas Bächler, 
Thomas Gleixner and me already wasted hours on this problem, and these 
kinds of issues will reoccur again and again - in perhaps even more 
spurious ways.

Picking up randon environment details during build reduces 
reproducability (i couldnt reproduce the problem using the exact same 
toolchain) and might break various existing setups and distro builds as 
well.

At minimum the extra CFLAGS needs to be put into the .config - but 
that's not a too nice solution either. How about just adding an 
extra-CFLAGS option to .config and perhaps a 'make configpickupCFLAGS' 
pass for anyone who wants to propagate the environment CFLAGS into the 
kernel build.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-04 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-29 21:46 2.6.24-rc1-82798a1 compile failure (x86_64) Thomas Bächler
2007-10-29 22:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
     [not found]   ` <47266BF6.6070206@archlinux.org>
     [not found]     ` <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0710300033470.3186@localhost.localdomain>
2007-10-30  9:10       ` Thomas Bächler
2007-11-03 10:04         ` Thomas Bächler
2007-11-03 12:11           ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-11-04  2:02             ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-04 10:04               ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-11-04 10:19                 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-11-04 10:31                 ` David Miller
2007-11-04 11:16                   ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-11-04 12:27                     ` Thomas Bächler
2007-11-04 15:29                   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-04 15:55                     ` Oleg Verych
2007-11-04 16:19                     ` Giacomo Catenazzi
2007-11-04 16:34                       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-04 18:33                         ` Giacomo Catenazzi
2007-11-05  4:03                         ` David Miller
2007-11-04 18:10                     ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-11-05  4:01                     ` David Miller
2007-11-06 17:32               ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-11-07  0:12                 ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071104100429.GA12311@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas@archlinux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox