From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757852AbXKDNgy (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Nov 2007 08:36:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755904AbXKDNgp (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Nov 2007 08:36:45 -0500 Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:36315 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755167AbXKDNgp (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Nov 2007 08:36:45 -0500 Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 06:36:43 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Al Boldi Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Massive slowdown when re-querying large nfs dir Message-ID: <20071104133642.GS15111@parisc-linux.org> References: <200711050758.38090.a1426z@gawab.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200711050758.38090.a1426z@gawab.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 07:58:38AM +0300, Al Boldi wrote: > Any ideas? How about tcpdumping and seeing what requests are flowing across the wire? You might be able to figure out what's being done differently. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."