From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754975AbXKEST5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2007 13:19:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752871AbXKESTu (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2007 13:19:50 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:58923 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752759AbXKESTt (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2007 13:19:49 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 10:13:32 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: Future of Linux 2.6.22.y series Message-ID: <20071105181332.GB28628@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org For the last release, I stated that I thought the 2.6.22.12 release would be the last one in the 2.6.22.y series. Since then, I've received a number of other patches that would be nice to have in the .22.y tree. So, for a while, I'll keep the 2.6.22.y tree open, doing new releases every once in a while as they accumulate. I do this, for no other than the selfish reason that I use it every day on my openSuSE 10.3 boxes as that is the kernel base that release is on :) If anyone has any objections or questions about this, please let me know. thanks, greg k-h