public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64
@ 2007-11-08 17:19 Valdis.Kletnieks
  2007-11-08 18:02 ` Andrew Morton
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Valdis.Kletnieks @ 2007-11-08 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton, Mark Gross; +Cc: linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1958 bytes --]

(Sorry for not reporting this sooner - I haven't been running off battery
much in the last 3 weeks, so I didn't notice it till now...)

Dell Latitude D820 laptop, T7200 Core2 Duo CPU, x86_64 kernel.

As reported by 'powertop' on a basically idle machine:

2.6.23-mm1:

Cn                Avg residency       P-states (frequencies)
C0 (cpu running)        (100.0%)        2.00 Ghz     0.8%
C1                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1.67 Ghz     0.0%
C2                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1333 Mhz     0.0%
C3                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1000 Mhz    99.2%

2.6.23-rc8-mm2:

Cn                Avg residency       P-states (frequencies)
C0 (cpu running)        ( 0.3%)         2.00 Ghz     0.0%
C1                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1.67 Ghz     0.0%
C2                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1333 Mhz     0.0%
C3               31.5ms (99.7%)         1000 Mhz   100.0%

In addition, the ACPI power estimate reported about 25 watts for 23-mm1,
but only 21 watts for -rc8-mm2, a significant regression.

I bisected this down to this set of patches:

pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface.patch
pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface-fix.patch
pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface-vs-git-acpi.patch
pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface-vs-git-acpi-2.patch
latencyc-use-qos-infrastructure.patch

The patch says:

  To register the default pm_qos target for the specific parameter, the
  process must open one of /dev/[cpu_dma_latency, network_latency,
  network_throughput]

  As long as the device node is held open that process has a registered
  requirement on the parameter.  The name of the requirement is
  "process_<PID>" derived from the current->pid from within the open system
  call.

I shouldn't have to have a process open a /dev/file, write a number, and then
stay around forever so the file doesn't close in order to get the same behavior
I was getting by default before.  What needs to happen to get this to not
be a behavior regression/change?





[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64
  2007-11-08 17:19 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64 Valdis.Kletnieks
@ 2007-11-08 18:02 ` Andrew Morton
  2007-11-08 20:03   ` Mark Gross
  2007-11-08 18:07 ` Mark Gross
  2007-11-08 22:30 ` Mark Gross
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2007-11-08 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Valdis.Kletnieks; +Cc: mgross, linux-kernel

> On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:19:44 -0500 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> (Sorry for not reporting this sooner - I haven't been running off battery
> much in the last 3 weeks, so I didn't notice it till now...)
> 
> Dell Latitude D820 laptop, T7200 Core2 Duo CPU, x86_64 kernel.
> 
> As reported by 'powertop' on a basically idle machine:
> 
> 2.6.23-mm1:
> 
> Cn                Avg residency       P-states (frequencies)
> C0 (cpu running)        (100.0%)        2.00 Ghz     0.8%
> C1                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1.67 Ghz     0.0%
> C2                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1333 Mhz     0.0%
> C3                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1000 Mhz    99.2%
> 
> 2.6.23-rc8-mm2:
> 
> Cn                Avg residency       P-states (frequencies)
> C0 (cpu running)        ( 0.3%)         2.00 Ghz     0.0%
> C1                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1.67 Ghz     0.0%
> C2                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1333 Mhz     0.0%
> C3               31.5ms (99.7%)         1000 Mhz   100.0%
> 
> In addition, the ACPI power estimate reported about 25 watts for 23-mm1,
> but only 21 watts for -rc8-mm2, a significant regression.
> 
> I bisected this down to this set of patches:
> 
> pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface.patch
> pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface-fix.patch
> pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface-vs-git-acpi.patch
> pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface-vs-git-acpi-2.patch
> latencyc-use-qos-infrastructure.patch
> 
> The patch says:
> 
>   To register the default pm_qos target for the specific parameter, the
>   process must open one of /dev/[cpu_dma_latency, network_latency,
>   network_throughput]
> 
>   As long as the device node is held open that process has a registered
>   requirement on the parameter.  The name of the requirement is
>   "process_<PID>" derived from the current->pid from within the open system
>   call.
> 
> I shouldn't have to have a process open a /dev/file, write a number, and then
> stay around forever so the file doesn't close in order to get the same behavior
> I was getting by default before.  What needs to happen to get this to not
> be a behavior regression/change?
> 

That's a great report, thanks.  Over to you, Mark ;)

btw, I also have a note here that these patches caused Rafael to see an
smp_call_function() inside local_irq_save().  Did that get fixed?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64
  2007-11-08 17:19 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64 Valdis.Kletnieks
  2007-11-08 18:02 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2007-11-08 18:07 ` Mark Gross
  2007-11-08 22:30 ` Mark Gross
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark Gross @ 2007-11-08 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Valdis.Kletnieks; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel

On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:19:44PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> (Sorry for not reporting this sooner - I haven't been running off battery
> much in the last 3 weeks, so I didn't notice it till now...)
> 
> Dell Latitude D820 laptop, T7200 Core2 Duo CPU, x86_64 kernel.
> 
> As reported by 'powertop' on a basically idle machine:
> 
> 2.6.23-mm1:
> 
> Cn                Avg residency       P-states (frequencies)
> C0 (cpu running)        (100.0%)        2.00 Ghz     0.8%
> C1                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1.67 Ghz     0.0%
> C2                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1333 Mhz     0.0%
> C3                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1000 Mhz    99.2%
> 
> 2.6.23-rc8-mm2:
> 
> Cn                Avg residency       P-states (frequencies)
> C0 (cpu running)        ( 0.3%)         2.00 Ghz     0.0%
> C1                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1.67 Ghz     0.0%
> C2                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1333 Mhz     0.0%
> C3               31.5ms (99.7%)         1000 Mhz   100.0%
> 
> In addition, the ACPI power estimate reported about 25 watts for 23-mm1,
> but only 21 watts for -rc8-mm2, a significant regression.

well, thats because you burn less watts if you get into C3.  

> 
> I bisected this down to this set of patches:
> 
> pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface.patch
> pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface-fix.patch
> pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface-vs-git-acpi.patch
> pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface-vs-git-acpi-2.patch
> latencyc-use-qos-infrastructure.patch

yipes!  I'll look at it right away.  It looks like an integration issue
with CPU-IDLE patches (those control the C-state entry).  I'll get it
fixed up.

> 
> The patch says:
> 
>   To register the default pm_qos target for the specific parameter, the
>   process must open one of /dev/[cpu_dma_latency, network_latency,
>   network_throughput]
> 
>   As long as the device node is held open that process has a registered
>   requirement on the parameter.  The name of the requirement is
>   "process_<PID>" derived from the current->pid from within the open system
>   call.
> 
> I shouldn't have to have a process open a /dev/file, write a number, and then
> stay around forever so the file doesn't close in order to get the same behavior
> I was getting by default before.  What needs to happen to get this to not
> be a behavior regression/change?
>
you won't have such a process (at least I highly doubt you do)  I need
to fix this.  Thanks for taking the time to bisect it and reporting it to me!

--mgross

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64
  2007-11-08 18:02 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2007-11-08 20:03   ` Mark Gross
  2007-11-08 20:15     ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark Gross @ 2007-11-08 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks, linux-kernel

On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:02:12AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:19:44 -0500 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> > (Sorry for not reporting this sooner - I haven't been running off battery
> > much in the last 3 weeks, so I didn't notice it till now...)
> > 
> > Dell Latitude D820 laptop, T7200 Core2 Duo CPU, x86_64 kernel.
> > 
> > As reported by 'powertop' on a basically idle machine:
> > 
> > 2.6.23-mm1:
> > 
> > Cn                Avg residency       P-states (frequencies)
> > C0 (cpu running)        (100.0%)        2.00 Ghz     0.8%
> > C1                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1.67 Ghz     0.0%
> > C2                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1333 Mhz     0.0%
> > C3                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1000 Mhz    99.2%
> > 
> > 2.6.23-rc8-mm2:
> > 
> > Cn                Avg residency       P-states (frequencies)
> > C0 (cpu running)        ( 0.3%)         2.00 Ghz     0.0%
> > C1                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1.67 Ghz     0.0%
> > C2                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1333 Mhz     0.0%
> > C3               31.5ms (99.7%)         1000 Mhz   100.0%
> > 
> > In addition, the ACPI power estimate reported about 25 watts for 23-mm1,
> > but only 21 watts for -rc8-mm2, a significant regression.
> > 
> > I bisected this down to this set of patches:
> > 
> > pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface.patch
> > pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface-fix.patch
> > pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface-vs-git-acpi.patch
> > pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface-vs-git-acpi-2.patch
> > latencyc-use-qos-infrastructure.patch
> > 
> > The patch says:
> > 
> >   To register the default pm_qos target for the specific parameter, the
> >   process must open one of /dev/[cpu_dma_latency, network_latency,
> >   network_throughput]
> > 
> >   As long as the device node is held open that process has a registered
> >   requirement on the parameter.  The name of the requirement is
> >   "process_<PID>" derived from the current->pid from within the open system
> >   call.
> > 
> > I shouldn't have to have a process open a /dev/file, write a number, and then
> > stay around forever so the file doesn't close in order to get the same behavior
> > I was getting by default before.  What needs to happen to get this to not
> > be a behavior regression/change?
> > 
> 
> That's a great report, thanks.  Over to you, Mark ;)
> 
> btw, I also have a note here that these patches caused Rafael to see an
> smp_call_function() inside local_irq_save().  Did that get fixed?

Ah, I see the problem.  I think I posted a fix to this.  The problem is
that what's in the mm1 tree has a parameter PM_QOS_IDLE that needed to
be PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY. 

I'm not sure what's in the current MM tree at this point so I can't say
its been fixed.  Is there an easy way from me to see what's currently in
MM?  

FWIW I think I fixed this when I fixed up Rafael's issue.  Would you
like me to send out a re-fresh patch against 2.6.23-mm1?

--mgross


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64
  2007-11-08 20:03   ` Mark Gross
@ 2007-11-08 20:15     ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2007-11-08 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mgross; +Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks, linux-kernel

> On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 12:03:52 -0800 Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> ...
> > >   call.
> > > 
> > > I shouldn't have to have a process open a /dev/file, write a number, and then
> > > stay around forever so the file doesn't close in order to get the same behavior
> > > I was getting by default before.  What needs to happen to get this to not
> > > be a behavior regression/change?
> > > 
> > 
> > That's a great report, thanks.  Over to you, Mark ;)
> > 
> > btw, I also have a note here that these patches caused Rafael to see an
> > smp_call_function() inside local_irq_save().  Did that get fixed?
> 
> Ah, I see the problem.  I think I posted a fix to this.  The problem is
> that what's in the mm1 tree has a parameter PM_QOS_IDLE that needed to
> be PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY. 

That doesn't ring a bell.

> I'm not sure what's in the current MM tree at this point so I can't say
> its been fixed.  Is there an easy way from me to see what's currently in
> MM?  

Not terribly. 
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/mm/broken-out-2007-11-06-02-32.tar.gz
is from two days ago.

> FWIW I think I fixed this when I fixed up Rafael's issue.  Would you
> like me to send out a re-fresh patch against 2.6.23-mm1?

sure.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64
  2007-11-08 17:19 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64 Valdis.Kletnieks
  2007-11-08 18:02 ` Andrew Morton
  2007-11-08 18:07 ` Mark Gross
@ 2007-11-08 22:30 ` Mark Gross
  2007-11-09 20:24   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark Gross @ 2007-11-08 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Valdis.Kletnieks; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel

On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:19:44PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> (Sorry for not reporting this sooner - I haven't been running off battery
> much in the last 3 weeks, so I didn't notice it till now...)
> 
> Dell Latitude D820 laptop, T7200 Core2 Duo CPU, x86_64 kernel.
> 
> As reported by 'powertop' on a basically idle machine:
> 
> 2.6.23-mm1:
> 
> Cn                Avg residency       P-states (frequencies)
> C0 (cpu running)        (100.0%)        2.00 Ghz     0.8%
> C1                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1.67 Ghz     0.0%
> C2                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1333 Mhz     0.0%
> C3                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1000 Mhz    99.2%
> 
> 2.6.23-rc8-mm2:
> 
> Cn                Avg residency       P-states (frequencies)
> C0 (cpu running)        ( 0.3%)         2.00 Ghz     0.0%
> C1                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1.67 Ghz     0.0%
> C2                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1333 Mhz     0.0%
> C3               31.5ms (99.7%)         1000 Mhz   100.0%
> 
> In addition, the ACPI power estimate reported about 25 watts for 23-mm1,
> but only 21 watts for -rc8-mm2, a significant regression.
> 
> I bisected this down to this set of patches:
> 
> pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface.patch
> pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface-fix.patch
> pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface-vs-git-acpi.patch
> pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface-vs-git-acpi-2.patch
> latencyc-use-qos-infrastructure.patch
> 
> The patch says:
> 
>   To register the default pm_qos target for the specific parameter, the
>   process must open one of /dev/[cpu_dma_latency, network_latency,
>   network_throughput]
> 
>   As long as the device node is held open that process has a registered
>   requirement on the parameter.  The name of the requirement is
>   "process_<PID>" derived from the current->pid from within the open system
>   call.
> 
> I shouldn't have to have a process open a /dev/file, write a number, and then
> stay around forever so the file doesn't close in order to get the same behavior
> I was getting by default before.  What needs to happen to get this to not
> be a behavior regression/change?
> 
> 
> 
> 

wing patch fixes up the cpuidle / pm-qos integration.

I suspect that this is folded into another mm patch but it should fix
C-state issue identified.

--mgross



Signed-off-by: mark gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>

-------------

Index: linux-2.6.23-mm1/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.23-mm1.orig/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c	2007-11-08 13:09:53.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.23-mm1/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c	2007-11-08 13:25:13.000000000 -0800
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@
 
 static inline void latency_notifier_init(struct notifier_block *n)
 {
-        pm_qos_add_notifier(PM_QOS_CPUIDLE, n);
+	pm_qos_add_notifier(PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY, n);
 }
 
 #else /* CONFIG_SMP */
Index: linux-2.6.23-mm1/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.23-mm1.orig/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c	2007-11-08 13:09:53.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.23-mm1/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c	2007-11-08 13:11:30.000000000 -0800
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
 	if (last_idx < dev->state_count - 1 &&
 	    last_residency > last_state->threshold.promotion_time &&
 	    dev->states[last_idx + 1].exit_latency <=
-			pm_qos_requirement(PM_QOS_CPUIDLE)) {
+			pm_qos_requirement(PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY)) {
 		last_state->stats.promotion_count++;
 		last_state->stats.demotion_count = 0;
 		if (last_state->stats.promotion_count >= last_state->threshold.promotion_count) {
Index: linux-2.6.23-mm1/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.23-mm1.orig/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c	2007-11-08 13:12:11.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.23-mm1/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c	2007-11-08 13:24:03.000000000 -0800
@@ -48,7 +48,8 @@
 			break;
 		if (s->target_residency > data->predicted_us)
 			break;
-		if (s->exit_latency > pm_qos_requirement(PM_QOS_CPUIDLE))
+		if (s->exit_latency >
+			pm_qos_requirement(PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY))
 			break;
 	}
 
Index: linux-2.6.23-mm1/include/linux/pm_qos_params.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.23-mm1.orig/include/linux/pm_qos_params.h	2007-11-08 13:09:53.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.23-mm1/include/linux/pm_qos_params.h	2007-11-08 13:14:05.000000000 -0800
@@ -6,23 +6,12 @@
 #include <linux/notifier.h>
 #include <linux/miscdevice.h>
 
-struct requirement_list {
-	struct list_head list;
-	union {
-		s32 value;
-		s32 usec;
-		s32 kbps;
-	};
-	char *name;
-};
-
 #define PM_QOS_RESERVED 0
 #define PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY 1
 #define PM_QOS_NETWORK_LATENCY 2
 #define PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT 3
-#define PM_QOS_CPUIDLE 4
 
-#define PM_QOS_NUM_CLASSES 5
+#define PM_QOS_NUM_CLASSES 4
 #define PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE -1
 
 int pm_qos_add_requirement(int qos, char *name, s32 value);
Index: linux-2.6.23-mm1/kernel/pm_qos_params.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.23-mm1.orig/kernel/pm_qos_params.c	2007-11-08 13:09:54.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.23-mm1/kernel/pm_qos_params.c	2007-11-08 13:14:28.000000000 -0800
@@ -47,6 +47,16 @@
  * held, taken with _irqsave.  One lock to rule them all
  */
 
+struct requirement_list {
+	struct list_head list;
+	union {
+		s32 value;
+		s32 usec;
+		s32 kbps;
+	};
+	char *name;
+};
+
 struct pm_qos_object {
 	struct requirement_list requirements;
 	struct srcu_notifier_head notifiers;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64
  2007-11-08 22:30 ` Mark Gross
@ 2007-11-09 20:24   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
  2007-11-12  4:26     ` mark gross
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Valdis.Kletnieks @ 2007-11-09 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mgross; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 357 bytes --]

On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:30:07 PST, Mark Gross said:

> wing patch fixes up the cpuidle / pm-qos integration.
> 
> I suspect that this is folded into another mm patch but it should fix
> C-state issue identified.

Confirming that patch left my CPUs mostly in C3 again. Thanks.

I'll have to let Mark and Andrew figure out this code's status in the -mm queue.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64
  2007-11-09 20:24   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
@ 2007-11-12  4:26     ` mark gross
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: mark gross @ 2007-11-12  4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Valdis.Kletnieks; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel

On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 03:24:44PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:30:07 PST, Mark Gross said:
> 
> > wing patch fixes up the cpuidle / pm-qos integration.
> > 
> > I suspect that this is folded into another mm patch but it should fix
> > C-state issue identified.
> 
> Confirming that patch left my CPUs mostly in C3 again. Thanks.
> 
> I'll have to let Mark and Andrew figure out this code's status in the -mm queue.

I checked on this last week, I'm pretty sure its in Andrew's current
tree.

Thanks again for looking at this.

--mgross

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-11-12 16:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-11-08 17:19 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64 Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-11-08 18:02 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08 20:03   ` Mark Gross
2007-11-08 20:15     ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08 18:07 ` Mark Gross
2007-11-08 22:30 ` Mark Gross
2007-11-09 20:24   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-11-12  4:26     ` mark gross

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox