public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ARM defconfig bogosity in current git
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 12:49:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071110114953.GL26163@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071110112632.GQ8087@pengutronix.de>

On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 12:26:32PM +0100, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 09:10:57AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arm/configs/netx_defconfig b/arm/configs/netx_defconfig
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..57f32f3
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arm/configs/netx_defconfig
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > Isn't there something in Documentation/ about -p1 being a good idea
> > > precisely so this sort of silliness is avoided?
> > 
> > -p1 doesn't avoid this when the patch just contains new files.
> > Unfortunately, you have to rely both on people spotting such things
> > and whoever's generating the patch doing the right thing.
> > 
> > There will be times when things slip through though.
> > 
> > > Currently this breaks tab completion on arch/, which is very much a
> > > regression ;-)
> > 
> > Robert?
> 
> Aaargh, that came from a broken script changing the patch from p0 to p1...
> Please simply revert that patch, I'll send a new and correct one.

You should also check what you sent - the contents of this file was 
exactly the same as arch/arm/configs/netx_defconfig is since one year.

> Sorry for the noise.
> 
> Robert

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-10 11:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-10  8:06 ARM defconfig bogosity in current git Paul Mundt
2007-11-10  9:10 ` Russell King
2007-11-10 11:26   ` Robert Schwebel
2007-11-10 11:49     ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2007-11-10 13:40       ` Robert Schwebel
2007-11-10 13:41         ` [PATCH] netx: remove bogus defconfig patch with wrong -p Robert Schwebel
2007-11-11  9:41           ` Russell King
2007-11-11 17:50             ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071110114953.GL26163@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=r.schwebel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox