linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-am33-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Suppress A.OUT library support if !CONFIG_BINFMT_AOUT [try #5]
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:46:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711111646.27496.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071111151951.GP21669@stusta.de>


> My thoughts go more into the direction that we have hundreds of similar
> cases where e.g. a VFS function might currently only by used by OCFS2
> and therefore be dead code for most users, and the only maintainable
> solution will be to solve these at the compiler and/or linker level.

 -ffunction-sections can mostly do it, but only for non modular kernels

One problem is that EXPORT_SYMBOL always creates a reference to the function
even when nothing uses it.

We would need a weak EXPORT_SYMBOL and some way to check references
over main kernel and modules. I suppose it could be done as part of modpost
and then generating a custom linker script that only includes the function
sections referenced by anybody. But to make this work it would require
putting all the EXPORT_SYMBOLs into own sections too, but I suppose
that would be possible.

In the past we had trouble that the explicit linker scripts mentioning every 
function section made the linker very slow, but perhaps that's fixed now.

The whole thing would likely made a lot of out of tree modules unhappy
though. Distribution kernels might need to turn it off generally because of 
that. 

The question is if it would be still have a large enough user base without the 
distribution kernels. If it would be only used by a few users I don't think 
the maintenance overhead would be worth it.

> Andi scheduled it for removal, and I don't know whether he already has a
> patch.

I don't have a patch yet, but I can submit one for -mm* if it's helpful.
It's not very difficult.

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-11 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-09 15:34 [PATCH 0/6] MN10300: Add the MN10300 architecture to Linux kernel [try #5] David Howells
2007-11-09 15:34 ` [PATCH 1/6] Suppress A.OUT library support if !CONFIG_BINFMT_AOUT " David Howells
2007-11-11  2:14   ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-11 11:25   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-11 13:59   ` David Howells
2007-11-11 14:22     ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-11 15:03     ` David Howells
2007-11-11 15:19       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-11 15:46         ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-11-11 16:05           ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-11 16:31         ` David Howells
2007-11-12 15:34   ` David Howells
2007-11-12 19:53     ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-12 22:50       ` SL Baur
2007-11-12 23:14       ` David Howells
2007-11-13  3:09         ` SL Baur
2007-11-13 10:57         ` David Howells
2007-11-13 11:18           ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-13 12:46             ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-13 20:40               ` Matt Mackall
2007-11-13 20:46                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-12-03 15:15   ` David Howells
2007-12-03 16:00     ` Ralf Baechle
2007-12-03 16:17       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-09 15:34 ` [PATCH 2/6] MTD: Add support for the SST 39VF1601 flash chip " David Howells
2007-11-09 22:34   ` David Woodhouse
2007-11-09 15:34 ` [PATCH 3/6] USB: net2280 can't have a function called show_registers() " David Howells
2007-11-09 15:34 ` [PATCH 4/6] MN10300: Allocate serial port UART IDs for on-chip serial ports " David Howells
2007-11-09 15:35 ` [PATCH 6/6] MN10300: Add MTD flash support for the ASB2303 board " David Howells
2007-11-10  4:05   ` David Woodhouse
2007-11-11 14:01   ` David Howells
     [not found] ` <20071109153458.20803.10594.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
2007-11-10  3:53   ` [PATCH 5/6] MN10300: Add the MN10300/AM33 architecture to the kernel " Andrew Morton
2007-11-10 12:18   ` David Howells
2007-11-10 19:43     ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-10 20:02       ` Alan Cox
2007-11-12  7:44       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-10 20:09     ` Alan Cox
2007-11-11 14:32     ` David Howells
2007-11-11 14:48     ` David Howells
2007-11-11 15:18       ` Alan Cox
2007-11-11 16:36       ` David Howells
2007-11-11 16:42         ` Alan Cox
2007-11-12 12:19         ` David Howells
2007-11-11 15:07     ` David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200711111646.27496.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-am33-list@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).