Re: [PATCH] 2.6.24-rc2-mm1 - Build Fail - fs/bfs/inode.c

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:30:54 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> The kernel build fails, with following error
> 
> fs/bfs/inode.c: In function ‘bfs_iget’:
> fs/bfs/inode.c:37: error: ‘ino’ redeclared as different kind of symbol
> fs/bfs/inode.c:35: error: previous definition of ‘ino’ was here
> fs/bfs/inode.c:37: error: ‘inode’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> fs/bfs/inode.c:37: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported onlyonce
> fs/bfs/inode.c:37: error: for each function it appears in.)
> make[2]: *** [fs/bfs/inode.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [fs/bfs] Error 2
> make: *** [fs] Error 2
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> --
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc2/fs/bfs/inode.c	2007-11-14 09:53:41.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc2/fs/bfs/~inode.c	2007-11-14 10:21:06.000000000 +0530
> @@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ void dump_imap(const char *prefix, struc
>  
>  struct inode *bfs_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
>  {
> -	unsigned long ino = inode->i_ino;
>  	struct bfs_inode *di;
>  	struct inode *inode;
>  	struct buffer_head *bh;
> 

bah.  That's what happens when I apply patches and fix rejects after doing
all my compile-coverage testing.

Thanks.  I put your two fixes into the hot-fixes/ directory.