From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: uml doesn't work on 2.6.24-rc2
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:36:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071114173639.GA7899@c2.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1IsK83-0008CJ-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 04:26:11PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> This one fixed the EINVAL messages, and now UML boots, but consumes
> 100% CPU constantly.
Can you strace it and see if you are seeing zero-length nanosleeps,
and then send me your config file? I've had one other report of this,
but haven't reproduced it here.
> > You'll also need f86f9e6d66027bdcdc9b40c06d431ee53ea0d509 for a
> > separate problem.
>
> I can't find this in -linus. Which tree is it?
My private tree, sorry - I looked at git-log output too quickly. The
patch is below. It's also in -mm.
> Never seen anything like this until 2.6.24. Strange...
It breaks ptrace on 6-argument system calls made by 32-bit sysenter.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
commit f86f9e6d66027bdcdc9b40c06d431ee53ea0d509
Author: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Date: Wed Nov 7 10:40:07 2007 -0500
From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
[ jdike - Pushing Chuck's patch - see http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/9/16/261 ]
When the 32-bit vDSO is used to make a system call, the %ebp register for
the 6th syscall arg has to be loaded from the user stack (where it's pushed
by the vDSO user code). The native i386 kernel always does this before
stopping for syscall tracing, so %ebp can be seen and modified via ptrace
to access the 6th syscall argument. The x86-64 kernel fails to do this,
presenting the stack address to ptrace instead. This makes the %rbp value
seen by 64-bit ptrace of a 32-bit process, and the %ebp value seen by a
32-bit caller of ptrace, both differ from the native i386 behavior.
This patch fixes the problem by putting the word loaded from the user stack
into %rbp before calling syscall_trace_enter, and reloading the 6th syscall
argument from there afterwards (so ptrace can change it). This makes the
behavior match that of i386 kernels.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com>
Original-Patch-By: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S | 19 ++++++-------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
index 18b2318..df588f0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
+++ b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
@@ -159,20 +159,16 @@ sysenter_do_call:
sysenter_tracesys:
CFI_RESTORE_STATE
+ xchgl %r9d,%ebp
SAVE_REST
CLEAR_RREGS
+ movq %r9,R9(%rsp)
movq $-ENOSYS,RAX(%rsp) /* really needed? */
movq %rsp,%rdi /* &pt_regs -> arg1 */
call syscall_trace_enter
LOAD_ARGS32 ARGOFFSET /* reload args from stack in case ptrace changed it */
RESTORE_REST
- movl %ebp, %ebp
- /* no need to do an access_ok check here because rbp has been
- 32bit zero extended */
-1: movl (%rbp),%r9d
- .section __ex_table,"a"
- .quad 1b,ia32_badarg
- .previous
+ xchgl %ebp,%r9d
jmp sysenter_do_call
CFI_ENDPROC
ENDPROC(ia32_sysenter_target)
@@ -262,20 +258,17 @@ cstar_do_call:
cstar_tracesys:
CFI_RESTORE_STATE
+ xchgl %r9d,%ebp
SAVE_REST
CLEAR_RREGS
+ movq %r9,R9(%rsp)
movq $-ENOSYS,RAX(%rsp) /* really needed? */
movq %rsp,%rdi /* &pt_regs -> arg1 */
call syscall_trace_enter
LOAD_ARGS32 ARGOFFSET /* reload args from stack in case ptrace changed it */
RESTORE_REST
+ xchgl %ebp,%r9d
movl RSP-ARGOFFSET(%rsp), %r8d
- /* no need to do an access_ok check here because r8 has been
- 32bit zero extended */
-1: movl (%r8),%r9d
- .section __ex_table,"a"
- .quad 1b,ia32_badarg
- .previous
jmp cstar_do_call
END(ia32_cstar_target)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-14 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-13 23:32 uml doesn't work on 2.6.24-rc2 Miklos Szeredi
2007-11-14 1:10 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-14 10:35 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-11-14 14:22 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-14 15:26 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-11-14 17:36 ` Jeff Dike [this message]
2007-11-14 21:29 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-11-16 17:06 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-22 18:08 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-11-22 23:51 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-23 8:59 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-11-23 9:01 ` [uml-devel] " Karol Swietlicki
2007-11-23 10:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2007-11-23 11:00 ` WANG Cong
2007-11-26 17:47 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-26 18:10 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-26 20:52 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-26 21:22 ` Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071114173639.GA7899@c2.user-mode-linux.org \
--to=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox