From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Subject: Re: User Mode Linux still broken in 2.6.23.1
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 23:58:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711142358.16072.rob@landley.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071114185444.GB14450@kroah.com>
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 12:54:44 Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 11:51:50PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > Building with the attached .config on x86-64, it does this:
> >
> > CC arch/um/kernel/smp.o
> > In file included from include/asm/arch/tlb.h:11,
> > from include/asm/tlb.h:4,
> > from arch/um/kernel/smp.c:8:
> > include/asm-generic/tlb.h: In function ???tlb_flush_mmu???:
> > include/asm-generic/tlb.h:76: error: implicit declaration of function
> > ???release_pages??? include/asm-generic/tlb.h: In function
> > ???tlb_remove_page???:
> > include/asm-generic/tlb.h:105: error: implicit declaration of function
> > ???page_cache_release??? make[1]: *** [arch/um/kernel/smp.o] Error 1
> > make: *** [arch/um/kernel] Error 2
> >
> > I've been doing the following to fix it. I know it's not the right fix,
> > (see the earlier thread about it at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/24/441 )
> > but could the one line fix go into the -stable queue 2.6.23 while a
> > proper fix goes into 2.6.24?
>
> I think the patches that I have just added to the stable queue for
> 2.6.23.2 will fix this. If not, please let me know after testing.
Where do I find these patches to test? I know where to find the stable
releases, but not the "stable queue".
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt just says there _is_ a stable queue, not
where to access it. Google's first hit for "linux stable queue" was
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/chrisw/stable-queue.git;a=shortlog
which apparently stopped updating in march...
Happy to test the patch you mentioned, if I can figure out where to find it...
Thanks,
Rob
--
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
- Ken Thompson.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-15 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-04 4:51 User Mode Linux still broken in 2.6.23.1 Rob Landley
2007-11-14 18:54 ` Greg KH
2007-11-15 5:58 ` Rob Landley [this message]
2007-11-15 6:02 ` Greg KH
2007-11-15 20:57 ` Rob Landley
2007-11-15 21:06 ` Greg KH
2007-11-16 3:08 ` [Patch] Fix UML broken (was Re: User Mode Linux still broken in 2.6.23.1) WANG Cong
2007-11-16 5:01 ` Rob Landley
2007-11-16 7:15 ` Greg KH
2007-11-16 15:51 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-16 16:53 ` Greg KH
2007-11-16 22:00 ` Rob Landley
2007-11-17 18:53 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-18 20:17 ` Rob Landley
2007-11-18 21:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-11-19 7:14 ` Rob Landley
2007-11-16 18:00 ` Rob Landley
2007-11-16 15:12 ` Jeff Dike
2007-11-16 15:26 ` WANG Cong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200711142358.16072.rob@landley.net \
--to=rob@landley.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox