From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762764AbXKORZb (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:25:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756187AbXKORZX (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:25:23 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:50257 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755819AbXKORZW (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:25:22 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,421,1188802800"; d="scan'208";a="271902509" Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:23:52 -0800 From: mark gross To: Andrew Morton Cc: Gabriel C , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc2-mm1 Message-ID: <20071115172352.GB24837@linux.intel.com> Reply-To: mgross@linux.intel.com References: <20071113175906.497a1a6a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <473A678C.2020507@googlemail.com> <473A76FA.4050701@googlemail.com> <20071114202959.GA21049@linux.intel.com> <20071114124008.095f307d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071114124008.095f307d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:40:08PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:29:59 -0800 mark gross wrote: > > > > > [ 102.366932] ======================= > > > > [ 108.552031] printk: 31 messages suppressed. > > > > > > > > > All this BUG / WARNINGS are caused by *-qos* patches. Reverting this 3 patches makes the BUGs go away : > > > > > > latencyc-use-qos-infrastructure.patch > > > pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface.patch > > > pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface-static-initialization-with-blocking-notifiers.patch > > > > > > > > > Gabriel > > > > > > > > This looks like the same issue Rafael saw. > > > > Try the patch in the following post: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119265627228498&w=2 > > > > Well that's not very good. _I_ can go fishing in my lkml archives for random > patches but not everyone is set up to do that. And the diff to which you > refer gets 100% rejects against rc2-mm1 anyway. > > Please prepare a tested, changelogged patch against rc2-mm1 asap. my bad. I didn't catch the 24-rc2-mm1 baseline for this issue. I'll look at this right way. --mgross