Re: [PATCHv2 2/4] x86&x86-64 support for sys_indirect

Ingo Molnar
2007-11-15T20:12:57Z

* Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> \>> + sys_call_table[INDIRECT_SYSCALL(regs)->eax] ((regs)->ebx,
> (regs)->ecx, \
> > ^^^^^-> I take it that ->eax is wrong here?
>
> Yep, my bad. I've retired the 32-bit machines around here.

weird - i built it on 32-bit and it should have failed the build?

Ingo