From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Why preallocate pmd in x86 32-bit PAE?
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:40:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071116004012.GE1806@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <473CCB66.2080601@zytor.com>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> IIRC, the present bit is ignored in the magic 4-entry PGD. All entries
>> have to be present.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 02:42:46PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> This is true, although you could point a PGD to an all-zero page if you
> really wanted to. You have to re-load CR3 after modifying the top-level
> entries.
There may be bigger fish to fry in terms of per-process overhead, if
you're trying to cut that down. The trouble with trying to address
some of those is that there is mutual antagonism between compactness
and expansibility in the process address space layout, so you'll end
up instantiating a lot more than you want barring some sort of provision
for a compact address space layout. Pagetable sharing is a far more
powerful resource scalability method, though it also needs cooperation
in user address space layout to reap its gains.
There are other overheads, of course, though they're more typically
per-something besides processes.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-16 0:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-15 21:57 Why preallocate pmd in x86 32-bit PAE? Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-11-15 22:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-15 22:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-16 0:40 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2007-11-16 0:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-16 11:16 ` Andi Kleen
2007-11-16 15:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-16 15:53 ` Andi Kleen
2007-11-16 16:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-16 17:12 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-11-16 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-16 18:30 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-11-16 19:14 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-11-16 19:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-16 19:43 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-11-16 17:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071116004012.GE1806@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox