From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Andreas Herrmann <aherrman@arcor.de>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kconfig: ARCH=x86 causes wrong utsname.machine
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:15:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071116221535.GA1810@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <473DB52F.2040703@zytor.com>
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 07:20:15AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> >The new ARCH=x86 kernel build causes weired machine strings on 32-bit.
> >For a cross-compiled kernel I have
> >
> > $ uname -m
> > x66_64
> >
> >For a kernel natively built on a 32 bit machine I have
> >
> > $ uname -m
> > x66
> >
> >Looking at the sources, I think that utsname->machine was initially
> >set as "x86_64" and "x86", respectively.
> >But in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c in check_bugs() the second character
> >is set to '6' on my K7.
> >
> >I think the right solution for that problem is to use "x86_64" as the
> >machine name for 64-bit and to keep the old "i[3456]86" strings for
> >32-bit kernels.
>
> Absolutely. This would be userspace-visible ABI breakage.
Any good suggestions here???
UTS_MACHINE is set in top-level Makefile and if we specify
make ARCH=x86
we do not know if i386 or x86_&4 is correct until the configuration
has been read.
Should we report a "make ARCH=x86" as uname -m == x86??
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-16 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-16 11:14 Kconfig: ARCH=x86 Andreas Herrmann
2007-11-16 12:37 ` Kconfig: ARCH=x86 causes wrong utsname.machine Andreas Herrmann
2007-11-16 15:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-16 22:15 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2007-11-16 22:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-16 23:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-17 7:57 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-11-17 10:16 ` [PATCH] x86: fix UTS_MACHINE to be "i386" for 32-bit build and "x86_64" for 64-bit build Andreas Herrmann
2007-11-16 12:43 ` Kconfig: ARCH=x86 Andreas Herrmann
2007-11-16 12:58 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071116221535.GA1810@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=aherrman@arcor.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox